EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS: A FIRM VALUE APPROACH
PHELIM BOYLE,WEIDONG TIAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219868105000422
2005-01-01
Journal of Derivatives Accounting
Abstract:Journal of Derivatives AccountingVol. 02, No. 02, pp. 189-201 (2005) ARTICLESNo AccessEXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS: A FIRM VALUE APPROACHPHELIM BOYLE and WEIDONG TIANPHELIM BOYLECenter for Advanced Studies in Finance, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Gl, Canada and WEIDONG TIANDeparment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Gl, Canadahttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219868105000422Cited by:0 PreviousNext AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AbstractExecutive stock options are an important component of executive compensation and the topic is of interest to both practitioners and academics. The vigorous debate on whether these options should be treated as an expense is subsiding but discussion continues on how these instruments should be valued in order to expense them. In this paper, executive stock options are viewed as contingent claims on a firm's assets and we formalize this through the concept of an augmented balance sheet. This means that the total market value of the firm's assets is equal to the market value of its traded securities plus the market value of its stock options. This approach leads to two valuation formulae for these options: one in terms of the firm's stock price and the other in terms of firm value. We explore the connections between these two approaches and derive explicit valuation formulae under certain assumptions.Keywords:Valuationexecutive stock optionsdilution References D. Aboody, Journal of Accounting and Economics 22, 357 (1996). Crossref, Google ScholarL. A. Bebchuk and J. M. Fried, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3), 71 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarL. A. Bebchuk, J. M. Fried and D. I. Walker, University of Chicago Law Review 69(3), 751 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarY. Bergman, B. Grundy and Z. Wiener, Journal of Finance 51(5), 1573 (1996). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. C. Bettis, J. M. Bizjak and M. L. Lemmon, Journal of Financial Economics 76(2), 445 (2005). Crossref, Google ScholarF. Black and M. Scholes, Journal of Political Economy 81(3), 637 (1973). Crossref, Google ScholarC. Botosan and M. Plumlee, Accounting Horizons 14(4), 311 (2001). Google ScholarM. R. Brenner, R. Sundaram and D. Yermack, Journal of Financial Economics 57(1), 103 (2000). Crossref, Google ScholarM. Broadie and J. B. Detemple, Review of Financial Studies 8(1), 161 (1995). Crossref, Google ScholarZ. Bodie, R. Kaplan and R. Merton, Harvard Business Review 81, (2003). Google Scholar Bodurtha, N. (2002). Dilution and multiple-issue tranches inherent in employee stock options valuation. Working Paper, The McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University . Google ScholarJ. Cai and A. Vijh, Journal of Derivatives (2005). Google ScholarJ. Carpenter, Journal of Financial Economics 48(2), 127 (1998). Crossref, Google ScholarP. Carr and V. Linetsky, European Finance Review 4(3), 211 (2000). Crossref, Google Scholar Chance, D. M. and T. -H. Yang (2004). Expected utility valuation of executive stock options in a binomial framework: a comparative anaylsis. Working Paper, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge . Google ScholarJ. Core and W. Guay, Journal of Accounting and Economics 28(2), 151 (1999). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Core and W. Guay, Journal of Financial Economics 61(2), 253 (2001). Crossref, Google Scholar Darsinos, T. and S. E. Satchell (2002). The implied distribution for stocks of companies with warrants and/or executive stock options. Working Paper, Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge . Google ScholarH. Demsetz and K. Lehn, Journal of Political Economy 93(6), 1155 (1985). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Detemple and S. Sundaresan, Review of Financial Studies 12(4), 835 (1999). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Detemple and W. Tian, Management Science 48(7), 917 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarP. Dybvig and M. Loewenstein, Review of Financial Studies 16(1), 145 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarD. Emanuel, Journal of Financial Economics 12(2), 211 (1983). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Ericsson and J. Reneby, Finance Letters 2, (2004). Google Scholar Financial Accounting Standards (2004). 123(R), Share Based Payment . Google ScholarD. Galai and M. Schneller, Journal of Finance 33(5), 1333 (1978). Crossref, Google Scholar Garvey, G. and T. Milbourn (2001). Do stock prices incorporate the potential dilution of employee stock options? Working Paper, Graduate School of Management, Claremont Graduate University . Google ScholarM. Hanlon, S. Rajgopal and T. Shevlin, Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1–3), 3 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarB. Hall and K. Murphy, American Economic Review 90(2), 209 (2000). Crossref, Google ScholarB. Hall and K. Murphy, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3), 49 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarC. Himmelberg, G. Hubbard and D. Palia, Journal of Financial Economics 53(3), 353 (1999). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Hull and A. White, Financial Analysts Journal 60(1), 114 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Hull and A. White, Journal of Derivative Accounting 1(1), 3 (2004). Link, Google ScholarS. Huddart, Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(2), 207 (1994). Crossref, Google Scholar International Accounting Standards (2004). IFRS 2, Share-Based Payment . Google Scholar Johnson, S., H. Ryan and Y. Tian (2003). Executive compensation and corporate fraud. Working paper, Louisiana State University . Google ScholarH. Leland, Journal of Finance 49(4), 1213 (1994). Crossref, Google ScholarA. Marcus and M. Kulatilaka, Financial Analysts Journal 50(5), 46 (1994). Google ScholarR. C. Merton, Journal of Finance 29(2), 449 (1974). Google ScholarS. Rajgopal and T. Shevlin, Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(2), 145 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarM. Rubinstein, Journal of Derivatives 3, 8 (1995). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Sidenius, Financial Analysts Journal 52(5), 77 (1996). Crossref, Google ScholarD. Yermack, Journal of Finance 52(2), 449 (1997). Crossref, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Recommended Vol. 02, No. 02 Metrics History KeywordsValuationexecutive stock optionsdilutionPDF download