Abstract:In a series of papers Holmstrom, Milgrom and Roberts have argued that incentives for agents tend to be complementary under certain conditions. A growing body of empirical literature also appears to support this notion. Data constraints, however, have limited the studies to some particular industries or to a selective few aspects in agency contracts. This paper examines the complementarity and substitutability of CEO incentives of more than 300 Chinese state-owned enterprises from a panel data set. The data contain rich information about CEO pay sensitivity; whether the CEO posted performance bond; managerial discretion in production, in employee wage discretion, share of output to sell to the market (versus being required to deliver to the state at lower price); and contract duration. In explaining the interaction of incentives, we extend the framework of Holmstrom and Milgrom (1994) to accommodate the case of multiple signals for the manager's effort for each task. We classify the various incentive instruments into three tasks of CEOs: to pursue current financial performance, to invest for future financial performance, and to work on other activities that yield private benefits. The model then suggests that these three incentive indices should be complementary, and the individual incentives within an incentive index should be substitutes. Our empirical examination confirms these predictions. A side product of getting the conditional correlations is to be able to examine the determinants of the three incentive indices. We find that the determination of CEO incentives for current performance is consistent with the risk-incentive tradeoff hypothesis. The determination of managerial discretion is consistent with the incomplete contract literature that control rights should be matched with the party with superior information and ability. There is also evidence that the government uses contract duration to elicit information.

Repeated Moral Hazard and Executive Stock Option

Stock and Option Proportions in Executive Compensation

Relation,Moral Hazard,and Effective Managerial Incentives

Should Executive Stock Options Be Abandoned?

Option implied riskiness and risk-taking incentives of executive compensation

Optimal CEO Turnover

The 1990s witnessed an explosion in the use of restricted stock and stock options

Optimal Compensation Contracts when Managers Can Hedge

Optimal Executive Compensation when Firm Size Follows Geometric Brownian Motion

Stock Grants As a Commitment Device

Complementarity and Substitutability of CEO Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

A Quantitative Model of Dynamic Moral Hazard

A dynamic analysis of executive stock options: Determinants and consequences

Relative Wealth Concerns, Executive Compensation, and Systemic Risk-Taking

Do Stock Options Overcome Managerial Risk Aversion? Evidence from Exercises of Executive Stock Options

Option compensation, dynamic investment and capital structure

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

The exercise and valuation of executive stock options

Stock option plans for non-executive employees

CEO compensation complexity: Optimal contracts or agency problems?

Motives of Stock Option Incentive Design, Ownership, and Inefficient Investment