The medium is the massage
Barry Sandywell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.868021
2015-12-02
Abstract:In some respects, Marshall McLuhan is a forgotten thinker, a path-breaker in ‘media theory’, who has been overtaken by more original theorists and more pressing concerns. McLuhan was a paradigmatic child of the 1960s and the packaged mélange of themes he invented and popularized – the media-is-the-message, the coming electronic communications revolution, the social impact of the electronic age, the politics of the global village, and so on – were for many their first introduction to ‘mass communication theory’ and the pseudo-intellectual movement of ‘McLuhanism’. No doubt McLuhan was also something of a self-publicist, a denizen of ‘celebrity culture’ before the term was invented and, perhaps, even a bit of an intellectual charlatan. But the series of books he published in the 1960s – The Gutenberg galaxy (1962), The medium is the message and Understanding media: The extensions of man (1967b) – also ruffled feathers, disturbed the academic establishment, generated novel lines of thought and created agendas that are still being theorized and researched. Like Jean Baudrillard a decade or so later, McLuhan was a provocateur and, perhaps, to borrow David Beer’s phrase, an early instance of punk sociology (Beer, 2014) In what follows, I wish to reappraise McLuhan’s impact upon an earlier version of myself as a young sociologist studying for a university degree in the social sciences between 1967 and 1970. In re-visiting McLuhan’s book The medium is the massage (1967a), I will detail three idea constellations under the headings: McLuhan’s communications problematic, Convergent lines of media inquiry, and McLuhan’s futurity.
Art,Sociology