The effect of interface structures on deformation behavior of Cu/Ni multilayer by molecular dynamics
Weiwei Pang,Aosong Liu,Kai Yang,Renbin Chen,Xiaotong Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-024-01291-y
IF: 2.7
2024-01-29
Journal of Materials Research
Abstract:Molecular dynamics investigated the effect of interface structures on deformation behavior of Cu/Ni multilayer. Interface structures of (1¯11¯)$$({\bar{1}1\bar{1}})$$-model, (001)$${(001)}$$-model, and (1¯10)$$( {\bar{1}10})$$-model display triangular, square, and rectangular, respectively. ((1¯11¯)$$({\bar{1}1\bar{1}})$$-model has the largest compressive strength and (001)$${(}001{)}$$-model has the largest compressive strain. For three models, plastic yields are triggered by new lattice dislocation nucleation, interfacial misfit dislocation decomposition, and interfacial misfit dislocation slip, respectively, plastic processes are dominated by leading and trailing dislocations, leading dislocations, leading and trailing dislocations, respectively. During plastic deformation process, Lomer-Cottrell locks and Hirth locks formed in (001)$$({001})$$-model, as well as necklace-like dislocation segments formed in (1¯10)$$( {\bar{1}10})$$-model partly harden the multilayer. The barrier for dislocation crossing interface in (1¯11¯)$$( {\bar{1}1\bar{1}})$$-model is the largest. The calculated dislocation density and interface thickness of 1¯11¯$$\left( {\overline{1}1\overline{1}} \right)$$-model are the largest, followed by (001)-model and (1¯10)$$({\bar{1}10})$$-model. The sensitivity of different models to strain rate, temperature, and layer thickness is also discussed.Graphical abstract
materials science, multidisciplinary