New Change of the Islamic Sectarian Disputes in the Middle East

Wu Bingbing
2012-01-01
Abstract:The existing differences and disputes between the Sunnis and Shiites do not inevitably lead to inter-sectarian conflicts.The Shiite identity has been strengthened since Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979.Generally speaking,the current sectarian disputes reflect the evolution of the strategic structure in the Middle East.After the Cold War,confrontation between pro-U.S.camp and anti-U.S.camp became the key feature of the strategic structure in the Middle East as a result of the U.S.intention to pursue hegemony in the region.The reality that many Sunni regimes were in the anti-U.S.camp without a leadership hold by Iran made sectarian approach meaningless to analyze the situation in the Middle East.However,the 2003 Iraq War created a rising Iran which began to play a leading role in the new anti-U.S.camp mainly consisting of Shiite countries and forces,and a strong sectarian approach including discourse and way of thinking began to be widely spread and has contributed to isolate Iran,conceal the U.S.intention to pursue hegemony,and protect the Gulf Arab countries.During the fundamental changes in the Middle East since 2011,Egypt is trying to avoid the sectarian discourse and restore relations with Iran,while countries like Saudi Arabia are fuelling the sectarian tensions to confront Iran.A new strategic structure in the Middle East is emerging based on these new trends.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?