Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

On Prosecutor' Power of Technical Surveillance

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

On the Reconstruction of the Legal Supervision System of China's Telecomunication Monitoring Measures

The Boundary of Prosecutorial Supervision on Administrative Illegal Behavior

On Civil Prosecutorial Suggestion

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws

The Research on Supervision Mechanism of Corruption Crimes Investigation

Study on Judicial Review of Investigative Power

On Investigative Measures of Public Security Organs when Involved in a Public Security Case

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

On Objective Responsibility of Prosecutors

The Study of the Application of the Designated Residential Surveillance System

Something Lost, Something Gained: Changes in China’s Procuratorate in Response to the Reform of the National Supervision System

Discussion on the Dynamical Mechanism of Procurator Organs to Investigate the Crime

Chinese Procuratorate's Functions and Power Allocation in Civil Procedure

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

Re-Classification and Theoretical Study of the Civil Prosecutorial Suggestions

On Investigation Personnel Appearing at Court as a Witness