Evaluation of the classification and clinical characteristics of oral lichen planus and its treatment effect in different clinical types: a retrospective study
Atsushi Abe,Yu Ito,Hiroki Hayashi,Moeko Momokita,Shinichi Taniguchi,Atsushi Nakayama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1314235/v1
2022-02-02
Abstract:Abstract Background : Oral lichen planus (OLP) is an intractable chronic inflammatory disease associated with dyskeratosis. Several clinical classifications of OLP have been reported. However, only a few detailed studies have investigated the clinical symptoms, classifications, and treatment effect. In this study, we investigated the clinical features of OLP at the time of the initial diagnosis and classified it using the clinical visual examination type classification. Furthermore, we evaluated whether there is a difference in the clinical characteristics and effectiveness of symptomatic treatment between the typical reticular type and other types of OLP. Methods : A total of 132 patients with OLP were included. Patients’ age, sex, chief complaints, clinical morphological forms, lesion sites, cytological and histopathological findings, therapeutic strategies, and therapeutic responsiveness were evaluated. Results : Of the 132 patients with OLP, there were 42 men and 90 women, with a mean age of 66.4±13.0 years. The buccal mucosa was the most affected site (n=95). The reticular form was the most common clinical morphological form, observed in 124 cases. Biopsy was performed in 48 patients. The erosive form was the most common among the biopsied lesions. Regarding therapeutic strategies, topical steroids were prescribed to 85 patients. Among these patients, 47 experienced symptomatic relief and 38 showed no changes in symptoms. Based on the clinical morphological form, the rates of symptomatic relief following topical steroid use were 70.4% for the reticular form and 15.9% for the erosive form. In patients with erosive and plaque-like forms, it was difficult to achieve symptomatic relief with topical steroid use, whereas in those with other forms, a moderate response was observed. Conclusion : Topical steroids are often ineffective in patients with the erosive or mixed form, and these clinical morphological forms are associated with a higher risk of malignant transformation compared with the other forms. Therefore, early histological examination is important. Trial registration number: Not applicable.