Abstract:Private international law,an indivisible part of each legal system,should have the same dignity and value as any other legal field.Consequently,conflict rules should be applied by judges ex officio rather than at the mercy of the parties.Neither the dispositive principle nor the adversarial principle nor a practical caring for the procedural interests of parties provides a strong argu ment for the facultative application of conflict rules.From the perspective of procedural law, however,the related rules of civil procedure should be taken into consideration in the analysis of the application mode of conflict rules. When the conflict rules are applied by judges ex officio,it is the judges' responsibility to disclose to the parties any information about the related conflict rules and the applicable law referred to.On the other hand,the parties should bear the duty to prove foreign law.The procedural interests of both parties will be best protected by this approach.The ex of ficio application of conflict rules does not mean any mandatory application of foreign law which conflict rules refer to.This mode does not neglect the will of parties on whether to apply foreign law,nor does it disregard the weighing of the costs and gains of applying foreign law by parties. The ex of ficio application of conflict rules is proximately a "procedural process".Its crucial function or purpose is that,when conflict rules or the applicable foreign law does not invoked by the parties initiatively,judges will disclose the law application problem to the parties and urge them to think it carefully.Consequently,the parties' right to apply foreign law will not be renounced due to their ignorance,incompetence or negligence.This mode will mostly protect the parties' rights under both international private law and substantive law. To make it clear to accept the ex of ficio application of conflict rules,which denotes to regard foreign legal systems as equal to ourselves and protect international private law order on conflict law rather than lex fori,will serve as a symbol of the magnanimity which China should show to the outside world as a great power.

Justice Contained in the Mechanism of Dispute Settlement in Civil Litigations

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Discussion on Solution Mechanism of Sports Competition Dispute in China

Study on the Essence of Litigation——The Internal Logic from Searching Fact to Realizing Procedural Justice

A Study on the Joint Mechanism in the Scope of Civil Action and Non-litigation Procedures

On Concensual Jurisdiction System:Legal Principles, Topics and Countermeasures

The Function and Procedure of the Civil Public Interests Litigation

Application Mode of Conflict Rule from the Perspective of Civil Procedure

The Jurisprudential Problems in the Early Stage of Chinese Litigation

Compromise:the Deep Theory and Empirical Research of the Conciliation

Reflections on Issues Concerning the Basic Principles of the Civil Procedural Law

A HistOrical InvestigatiOn On InternatiOnal Dispute Settlement Mechanism

The Research of Actionable Scope on Civil Disputes in the Transformation Period

The Pure Legitimacy of Litigation Proceedings

The Adversarialness and the Cooperation in Judicial Process

On the Protection of Procedural Interests

Judge's Strategy of Settling Lawsuits

Rethinking and Restructuring Non-Litigation Procedure

Internal Tension of the Procedural Law

Breaking the Dilemma Between Litigation and Non-litigation

An Analysis of the Psychological State of the Litigant in Civil Litigation and the Countermeasures