Abstract:The construction of cities and economic development lead to more and more serious environmental pollution, and the concept of green and low-carbon city has been proposed. Therefore, a series of requirements have been put forward for transportation. CO and other pollutants will be produced in the exhaust of conventional fuel vehicles, which will seriously affect the urban environment, especially at intersections with large passenger and vehicle flows. When multiple roads, especially more than 4 roads, intersect on urban roads, traffic organization can usually be achieved by using a roundabout. However, due to the limited capacity of the conventional roundabout, with the rapid increase of the traffic volume, and there are many vehicles in the circle lane change and interweaving behavior. This has caused serious congestion at the roundabout, the significantly increase in pollutants emissions and the decline in air quality. As an unconventional design, the turbo roundabouts use canalized traffic to allowed drivers to select the appropriate lanes in advance depending on their destinations so that different lanes within the circle do not interfere with one another, which improves the safety of the intersection while ensuring capacity. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the traffic efficiency and safety of the conventional roundabout scheme and turbo roundabout scheme for five-way intersections. Using VISSIM to simulate different forms of roundabout and analyzing the six selected evaluation indicators. The number of vehicles in different entrance lanes and the diameter of the circle are selected as sensitivity factors for sensitivity analysis. Finally, the factor analysis method (FAM) is used to classify the six indicators into two categories: traffic efficiency and traffic safety, so as to comprehensively evaluate the different schemes. The results show that the difference in performance between the two schemes was not significant at low traffic volumes. At high traffic volumes, the turbo roundabout was better than the conventional roundabout in terms of emissions, safety and throughput efficiency. CO emissions from vehicles on conventional roundabout are generally higher than those on turbo roundabout, up to 53.62%. Therefore, the turbo roundabout is more appropriate for heavy traffic conditions.

Calculating Method of Intergreen Interval for Roundabout

Inter-green interval calculation for signalized intersections

Study on the Scheme of Three Branch Interchange

Approximations and Simulation of the Optimal Change Interval for Roundabout

General Multi-Phase Intelligent Control Method for Traffic Flow at Single Intersection

Calculation method of travel time of right-turn vehicle at motor-and nonmotor-vehicle mixed traffic intersection

Planning methods and effect analysis of advance right-turn

Calculation Method of Critical Coordination Link Length Between Two Adjacent Intersections

Conflict delay models at two-phase intersection

Critical Condition for Setting Left-turn Waiting Area

Intersection Control Considering Channelized Section Spillback Using a Flexible Phase Plan

Bicycle Conversion Factor Calibration at Two-Phase Intersections in Mixed Traffic Flows

Method of computing left-turn vehicle traffic capacity at two-phase intersection

A Study on the Headway Distribution of the Xueyuan Roundabout

Analysis om waiting area for left-turn vehicles at signalized intersections

The role of traffic conflicts in roundabout safety evaluation: A review

Urban Road Roundabout Method of Contrast Optimization and Research

Improvement of classical numerical method for arterial road signal coordinate control

Analyzing the relationship between the efficiency and safety of a turbo roundabout by the factor analysis method

Absolute minimum green calculation for vehicle phase at signalized intersections with bus rapid transit signal priority

Optimization Method of Signal Timing Parameters Considering Comprehensive Efficiency of All Approach Lanes