An Interpretative Analysis of Rule Copying or Refining
Ye Bifeng
2011-01-01
Abstract:According to the law interpretation of the Standing Committee of the NPC and the Supreme Court, the "law" in Paragraph 3, Article 22 of the Amendment of the Constitution, which says "state may, for the public interest, expropriate or take over private property of citizens for public use, and pay compensation in accordance with the law", belongs to its narrow sense. Governmental departments have no power to enact a law, thus they have no power to create a requisition and compensation system. Article 12 of the Emergency Response Law says that governmental departments can be the subject of emergency requisition. However, Article 52 of this Law and other current separate laws of emergency response has no such provision. Compared to Article 12, Article 52 and those current separate laws belong to special laws. Based on the interpretation principle that the special law derogates the general law, governmental departments are not the subject of emergency requisition and cannot make refinements to the emergency requisition article in the Emergency Response Law. As to compensation, those separate laws have different provisions from Article 12. As the provision of Article 12 is more effective to protect the interests of the citizens, the purpose interpretation must be applied to exclude those provisions in the separate laws. Moreover, this interpretation will not override the conclusion that governmental departments cannot make refinements to the emergency requisition article, because no power of requisition means no obligation of compensation, and hence no power to refine the compensation article. The phenomena of refining emergency requisition and compensation articles without power, or even copying rules of higher level law are already quite prevalent. It will lead to the wasting of rule —making resources and the dismemberment of legal provisions, and then destroy the rule of law. The refinement of rules and the local legislation should be based on the authorization of law or local power. To those rules that are forbidden or unnecessary to refine, we should strengthen the work of law interpretation and case guidance. General provisions in law, regulation and rule should also be more scientific and reasonable.