Abstract:With the advent of multicores, multithreaded programming has acquired increased importance. In order to obtain good performance, the synchronization constructs in multithreaded programs need to be carefully implemented. These implementations can be broadly classified into two categories: busy–wait and schedule‐based. For shared memory architectures, busy–wait synchronizations are preferred over schedule‐based synchronizations because they can achieve lower wakeup latency, especially when the expected wait time is much shorter than the scheduling time. While busy–wait synchronizations can improve the performance of multithreaded programs running on multicore machines, they create a challenge in program debugging, especially in detecting and identifying the causes of data races. Although significant research has been done on data race detection, prior works rely on one important assumption—the debuggers are aware of all the synchronization operations performed during a program run. This assumption is a significant limitation as multithreaded programs, including the popular SPLASH‐2 benchmark have busy–wait synchronizations such as barriers and flag synchronizations implemented in the user code. We show that the lack of knowledge of these synchronization operations leads to unnecessary reporting of numerous races. To tackle this problem, we propose a dynamic technique for identifying user‐defined synchronizations that are performed during a program run. Both software and hardware implementations are presented. Furthermore, our technique can be easily exploited by a record/replay system to significantly speedup the replay. It can also be leveraged by a transactional memory system to effectively resolve a livelock situation. Our evaluation confirms that our synchronization detector is highly accurate with no false negatives and very few false positives. We further observe that the knowledge of synchronization operations results in 23% reduction in replay time. Finally, we show that using synchronization knowledge livelocks can be efficiently avoided during runtime monitoring of programs. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Effective Synchronization Removal in Concurrent Java Programs

Finding Shrink Critical Section Refactoring Opportunities for the Evolution of Concurrent Code in Trustworthy Software

Automated Dynamic Detection of Busy–wait Synchronizations

Datalog-based Scalable Semantic Diffing of Concurrent Programs

Dynamic Recognition of Synchronization Operations for Improved Data Race Detection.

Detecting dead statements for concurrent programs

Approach to detect dead statements for concurrent programs

Static Dependency Analysis For Concurrent Ada 95 Programs

Thread-Sensitive Pointer Analysis for Inter-Thread Dataflow Detection.

A Two-Layered-Class Approach for the Reuse of Synchronization Code

Fixing, Preventing, and Recovering from Concurrency Bugs

Online Shared Memory Dependence Reduction Via Bisectional Coordination

Inter-procedural static slicing of concurrent programs based on threaded System Dependence Graph (tSDG)

Compile-Time Automatic Synchronization Insertion and Redundant Synchronization Elimination for GPU Kernels.

Technical Report: Using Static Analysis to Compute Benefit of Tolerating Consistency

A Lightweight System for Detecting and Tolerating Concurrency Bugs

Approaches to Obtaining Shared Memory Dependences for Dynamic Analysis of Concurrent Programs: A Survey

Slicing Concurrent Java Programs

Consistency Validation Method for Java Fine-Grained Lock Refactoring

Java Object Assign Once Analysis

Interactive abstract interpretation: reanalyzing multithreaded C programs for cheap