Abstract:With the advent of multicores, multithreaded programming has acquired increased importance. In order to obtain good performance, the synchronization constructs in multithreaded programs need to be carefully implemented. These implementations can be broadly classified into two categories: busy–wait and schedule‐based. For shared memory architectures, busy–wait synchronizations are preferred over schedule‐based synchronizations because they can achieve lower wakeup latency, especially when the expected wait time is much shorter than the scheduling time. While busy–wait synchronizations can improve the performance of multithreaded programs running on multicore machines, they create a challenge in program debugging, especially in detecting and identifying the causes of data races. Although significant research has been done on data race detection, prior works rely on one important assumption—the debuggers are aware of all the synchronization operations performed during a program run. This assumption is a significant limitation as multithreaded programs, including the popular SPLASH‐2 benchmark have busy–wait synchronizations such as barriers and flag synchronizations implemented in the user code. We show that the lack of knowledge of these synchronization operations leads to unnecessary reporting of numerous races. To tackle this problem, we propose a dynamic technique for identifying user‐defined synchronizations that are performed during a program run. Both software and hardware implementations are presented. Furthermore, our technique can be easily exploited by a record/replay system to significantly speedup the replay. It can also be leveraged by a transactional memory system to effectively resolve a livelock situation. Our evaluation confirms that our synchronization detector is highly accurate with no false negatives and very few false positives. We further observe that the knowledge of synchronization operations results in 23% reduction in replay time. Finally, we show that using synchronization knowledge livelocks can be efficiently avoided during runtime monitoring of programs. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Approach to detect dead statements for concurrent programs

Detecting dead statements for concurrent programs

Concurrent Ada Dead Statements Detection

Detecting Concurrently Executed Pairs of Statements Using an Adapted MHP Algorithm

An approach to analyzing dependency of concurrent programs

Detecting Deadlock in Ada Rendezvous Flow Structure Based on Process Algebra

Petri net modelling of Occam programs for detecting indeterminacy, non-termination and deadlock anomalies

Approaches to Obtaining Shared Memory Dependences for Dynamic Analysis of Concurrent Programs: A Survey

Automated Dynamic Detection of Busy–wait Synchronizations

Fast and Low Cost Deadlock Detection and Resolution in Distributed Systems

Effective Synchronization Removal in Concurrent Java Programs

A Survey on Exposing,Detecting and Avoiding Concurrency Bugs

Automated Testing of Definition-Use Data Flow for Multithreaded Programs.

Capability Analysis and Integrated Application of Deadlock Detection Tools

Static Dependency Analysis For Concurrent Ada 95 Programs

Petri Net Unfolding-Based Detection and Replay of Program Deadlocks

Inter-procedural static slicing of concurrent programs based on threaded System Dependence Graph (tSDG)

A SURVEY ON MODEL CHECKING-BASED CONCURRENT PROGRAMMING ANALYSIS

A framework for deadlock detection in core ABS

Context-Sensitive Data Race Detection for Concurrent Programs

Analysis of Commutativity with State-Chart Graph Representation of Concurrent Programs