The comparison study on diagnosis of the tubal distal occlusion by HSG B ultrasonography and laparoscopy

王海燕,乔杰,马彩虹,陈新娜,范燕宏,王丽娜,李蓉

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-878X.2006.06.009

2006-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the accuracy of diagnosis for the tubal distal occlusion by HSG and ultrasonography. Methods To Retrospectively study the clinical information of 63 tubal distal occlusion patients treated by laparoscope from April 2001 to December 2005 , which were diagnosed by hysterosalpinggography(HSG). The diagnositic results of HSG and B ultrasonography were compared with that by laparoscope. Results Of 111 cases diagnosed as distal occlusion tubes by HSG, 89 cases were confirmed by laproscopy, and the positive coincidence rate was 80.2 %(89/111). 22 subjects were falsely diagnosed as patients, and the false positive rate was 19.8 %(22/111). Of the 15 subjects not diagnosed as distal occlusion tubes by HSG, 13 were confirmed by laproscopy, with the negative coincidence rate of 86.7 %(13/15); and 2 tubes were abnormal, with the false negative rate of 13.3 %(2/15). Among 40 distal occulasion tubes diagnosed by B ultrasonography, 38 tubes were confirmed by laproscopy, and the positive coincidence rate was 95 %; 2 tubes were falsely diagnosed as patients, and false positive rate was 5 %. Among 86 tubes not diagnosed as patients by B ultrasonography, 42 tubes were confirmed by laproscopy, and the negative coincidence rate was 48.8 %(42/86); 44 were diagnosed as patients by laproscopy, the false negative rate of B ultrasonography was 51.2 %(44/86). Conclusion HSG can be used as the first step to diagnose the tube distal occlusion. The accuracy of diagnosis for tubes distal occlusion by B ultrasonography was higher. The laproscopy is the best diagnosis method for tubal lesion and can help doctors to make the right treatment for infertility .