Study of Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Reliability of Hysterosalpingography

ZHENG Xing-bang,GUAN Jing,SHEN Huan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7669/j.issn.0253-357X.2014.02.0131

2014-01-01

Abstract:[ABSTRACT]Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability of hysterosalpingog-raphy (HSG). Methods:Totally, 60 patients’ HSG films were retrospectively read by four clinic doctors. The diagnosis included proximal tubal obstruction, distal tubal obstruction, hydrosalpinx, pelvic adhesion and endometrial polyp. The diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability of HSG were respectively analyzed. Results:The diagnostic sensitivity of hydrosalpinx was 83.33%-100.00%and specificity was 97.22%-98.15%. The diagnostic specificity of proxmal tubal obstruction was 88.89%-92.60%, however the sensitivity was 75.00%-83.33%. The diagnostic sensitivity of distal tubal obstruction was 85.71%-92.86%, however the specificity was only 77.78%-81.11%. The diagnostic specificity of endometrial polyp was 94.23%-100.00%, however the sensitivity was only 12.50%-25.00%. The diagnostic sensitivity of pelvic adhesion was 58.93%-64.26%, specificity was 45.31%-64.06%. Theκvalue of hydrosalpinx was 0.758, proximal tubal obstruction was 0.815, distal tubal obstruction was 0.277, pelvic adhesion was 0.431, endometrial polyp was 0.658. Conclusion:The diagnostic performance of HSG for hydrosalpinx is satisfactory. The diagnostic specificity of proxmal tubal obstruction and endometrial polyp is satisfactory, but the sensitivity is poor. The diagnostic sensitivity of distal tubal obstructionis satisfactory, but the specificity is poor. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of pelvic adhesion are both poor, so the HSG diagnostic value of pelvic adhesion is limited. Intrareader reliability is good for proximal tubal obstruction and hydrosalpinx, but poor for the distal tubal obstruction and pelvic adhesion.