Abstract:In the realm of quality assurance, the significance of statistical measurement studies cannot be overstated, particularly when it comes to quantifying the diverse sources of variation in measurement processes. However, the complexity intensifies when addressing 3D topography data. This research introduces an intuitive similarity-based framework tailored for conducting measurement studies on 3D topography data, aiming to precisely quantify distinct sources of variation through the astute application of similarity evaluation techniques. In the proposed framework, we investigate the mean and variance of the similarity between 3D surface topography measurements to reveal the uniformity of the surface topography measurements and statistical reproducibility of the similarity evaluation procedure, respectively. The efficacy of our framework is vividly demonstrated through its application to measurements derived from additive-fabricated specimens. We considered four metal specimens with 20 segmented windows in total. The topography measurements were obtained by three operators using two scanning systems. We find that the repeatability variation of the topography measurements and the reproducibility variation in the measurements induced by operators are relatively smaller compared with the variation in the measurements induced by optical scanners. We also notice that the variation in the surface geometry of different surfaces is much larger in magnitude compared with the repeatability variation in the topography measurements. Our findings are consistent with the physical intuition and previous research. The ensuing experimental studies yield compelling evidence, affirming that our devised methods are adept at providing profound insights into the multifaceted sources of variation inherent in processes utilizing 3D surface topography data. This innovative framework not only showcases its applicability but also underlines its potential to significantly contribute to the field of quality assurance. By offering a systematic approach to measuring and comprehending variation in 3D topography data, it stands poised to become an indispensable tool in diverse quality assurance contexts.

Evaluation of the root-mean-square slope of 3D surface topography

Computation methods for fractal dimension of surface profile

3D Rough Surface Topography Model of Fractal Interpolation Based on Wavelet Transform

Evaluation of the Wavelet Transform Method for Machined Surface Topography I: Methodology Validation

SIMULATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF FRACTAL ROUGH SURFACES

Study on Optical Surface Roughness with Multi-fractal Spectrum

Research on fractal profile synthesis method for determinating height deviation and bearing rate

FRACTAL AND MULTIFRACTAL DESCRIPTION OF SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY

Study on the Surface Roughness of Substrate with Multi-Fractal Spectrum

Research into the Application of Fractal Geometry in Characterising Machined Surfaces

Data Processing Method Based On Surface And Tangent Vector Deviations For Freeform Surface

Measurement Studies Utilizing Similarity Evaluation between 3D Surface Topography Measurements

Fractal Analysis of Surface Topography in Ground Monocrystal Sapphire

The Fractal Characterization of Mechanical Surface Profile Based on Power Spectral Density and Monte-Carlo Method

Scale-dependent roughness parameters for topography analysis

Evaluation of the Wavelet Transform Method for Machined Surface Topography 2: Fractal Characteristic Analysis

Measurement of Surface Horizontal Profile Parameters Using Laser Scattering Distribution of Solid Angle

Surface Profile and Stress Field Evaluation Using Digital Gradient Sensing Method

Evaluation Of Road Roughness Based On Multi-Fractal Theory

Robustness of Surface Roughness against Low Number of Picture Elements and Its Benefit for Scaling Analysis

Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Method for Surface Topography