Rethinking the Mode and Method of Defining the Object of Quasi-Real Right

Cui Jianyuan

2011-01-01

Abstract:To define the natural resource as the object of the quasi —real right, the pledge of rights should be excluded from the system of quasi—real rights, and further classification is still needed. Still, if such definition is widely accepted, we should realize that the design of our Real Right Law and its corresponding theory have some defects. There are at least three methods to understand the wild animals. Firstly, an individual wild animal is the component of the wild animal resource, and the latter is an abstract entirety. Secondly, an individual wild animal is a single thing in civil law, while the whole wild animals constitute an assembled thing. Thirdly, not only the whole wild animals constitute an assembled thing, but several wild animals inhabited in certain hunting area also constitute an assembled thing. Different understandings have different legal constitutions and effects. The connotations of "certain water" and "partial water resource" are substantially the same. But based on different concepts, the theoretical interpretation will change subtly. The object of hunting right is not the individual wild animals only, or the hunting area by itself, but the hunting area with the partial wild animal resource inhabited in it.