Abstract:The common pool resource (CPR) theory has made invaluable contributions to the governance of natural resources in the past decades, but few literatures have specifically paid attention to the different property right arrangements of resource system and resource units, and their relationship. In this paper, we take two types of grassland property right system on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) in China, one is grassland contract system under that the previous grassland common use was given up and the other is grazing quota system under that the common use is still kept in the community level, as cases to present the different consequences on the ecological conditions, herders' livelihoods and livestock husbandry. Furthermore, from the perspective of property rights of resource system-units, we explore why the two systems resulted in the different consequences. We find that the grazing quota system indicated by the number of livestock each household allowed to raise has more advantages in improving the herders' livelihoods and reducing the livestock production costs, and both systems could alleviate the grazing pressure though the long-term effects of the contract system might be negative on ecological conditions. The main reason why the grazing quota system works better is that this type of individual use rights were clarified based on the resource units so the grassland could be kept common use as an integrated resource system, while the contract system was claimed by physically dividing the resource system by fencing, thus the resource system was fragmented which led to mismatch with the large scope movement needs of livestock grazing. We argue that, theoretically, the grazing quota system is a private property rights embedded in the grassland common property right system, which forms a nested property right regime. Our findings have important implications for both of the CPR theory and practical rangeland management worldwide.

PUBLIC DOMAIN OF RESOURCE AND PROPERTY RIGHTS SELECTION

The Social Construction Logic of Property Rights:A review on the property rights studies of Chinese sociologists from the perspective of game theory

Research on the Constitution of Regulatory Taking

The Level of Decentralization and Property Rights Protection––a Sociological Analysis of Property Rights

Characters of the property right structure of common property resources and use behavior

Discussion, Refution and Analysis on "separation of Three Rights" in Rural Collective Land Property Rights - Taking the Opinion to Reserve the Operation Rights of Land and to Trans Fer the Management Rights of Land During the Transferring of Operation And

Options for the Procurement of Environmental Water Rights-Market Allocation or Government Regulation?

Construct modern Chinese Property Law under the Balance of Public Power and Private Right

On the Method Selection in Business Deal of State-Owned Property Right Resourceof Modern Enterprises

FARMLAND PROPERTY RIGHT AND ITS APPLICATION BASED ON BARZEL'S THEORY

An Analysis on the Nature of Chinese Land Property Rights and Its Trajectory of Reform

COMPARISON OF EXPLOITATION OF PUBLIC RESOURCES IN THE LONG RUN UNDER TWO DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS

Brief Discussion on the Definition of Water Right in China

On Public Trust Doctrine of Natural Resources and It's Revelation to China

Analysis on the Low Efficient Allocation of Environmental Resources and the Facts That the Advantaged Groups Capture the Natural Capital

On Allocation of State Property Right Resources of China's Modern Enterprise

A Nested Property Right System of the Commons: Perspective of Resource System-Units

Endogenous property rights regimes, common-pool resources and trade

How Property Rights Matter to Firm Resource Investment: Evidence from China’s Property Law Enactment

On the Role of Public Property in Human Rights Protection in China

Division,Truncation Levels of Property Rights and Allocation Effects