Abstract:The common pool resource (CPR) theory has made invaluable contributions to the governance of natural resources in the past decades, but few literatures have specifically paid attention to the different property right arrangements of resource system and resource units, and their relationship. In this paper, we take two types of grassland property right system on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) in China, one is grassland contract system under that the previous grassland common use was given up and the other is grazing quota system under that the common use is still kept in the community level, as cases to present the different consequences on the ecological conditions, herders' livelihoods and livestock husbandry. Furthermore, from the perspective of property rights of resource system-units, we explore why the two systems resulted in the different consequences. We find that the grazing quota system indicated by the number of livestock each household allowed to raise has more advantages in improving the herders' livelihoods and reducing the livestock production costs, and both systems could alleviate the grazing pressure though the long-term effects of the contract system might be negative on ecological conditions. The main reason why the grazing quota system works better is that this type of individual use rights were clarified based on the resource units so the grassland could be kept common use as an integrated resource system, while the contract system was claimed by physically dividing the resource system by fencing, thus the resource system was fragmented which led to mismatch with the large scope movement needs of livestock grazing. We argue that, theoretically, the grazing quota system is a private property rights embedded in the grassland common property right system, which forms a nested property right regime. Our findings have important implications for both of the CPR theory and practical rangeland management worldwide.

On the Quasi - property Nature of Environmental Capacity Law and the Composition of Right thereof

Utilization of Environmental Capacity: Legal Attributes and Structure

The Cap-and-trade Model of Incremental Construction Land Quota: an Analog with the Emission Permits System

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

The relation between environmental protection and rational definition of environmental capacity property rights

On Clause Design for Land Contracting Management Right in Real Right Law

The Conflictions and Co- ordination between the Emission Right and other Rights

A study of legal attributes of carbon emission rights in carbon trading

Options for the Procurement of Environmental Water Rights-Market Allocation or Government Regulation?

Environmental regulation and environmental performance of enterprises: Quasi‐natural experiment of the new environmental protection law

Rethinking the Mode and Method of Defining the Object of Quasi-Real Right

The Legal Nature of Emission Rights – International Experience and Vietnamese Law

A Nested Property Right System of the Commons: Perspective of Resource System-Units

The Status Quo and Problems of Environmental Law Study in China

Environmental capacity and permissible discharge of rivers

An Exploration of Law Predicament of Environmental Right and the Solutions

Issues of Initial Allocation of Carbon Emission Right Fairness

Comment on the Mother Right of Rights over the Property of Another

Where Will the Theoretical Research on Environmental Rights Go

Analysis on the Low Efficient Allocation of Environmental Resources and the Facts That the Advantaged Groups Capture the Natural Capital

Brief Discussion on the Definition of Water Right in China