Abstract:Policy quantitative analysis can effectively evaluate the government's response to COVID-19 emergency management effect, and provide reference for the government to formulate follow-up policies. The content mining method is used to explore the 301 COVID-19 policies issued by the Central government of China since the outbreak of the epidemic in a multi-dimensional manner and comprehensively analyze the characteristics of epidemic prevention policies. Then, based on policy evaluation theory and data fusion theory, a COVID-19 policy evaluation model based on PMC-AE is established to evaluate quantitatively eight representative COVID-19 policy texts. The results show that: Firstly, China's COVID-19 policies are mainly aimed at providing economic support to enterprises and individuals affected by the epidemic, issued by 49 departments, and include 32.7 percent supply-level and 28.5 percent demand-level, and 25.8 percent environment-level. In addition, strategy-level policies accounted for at least 13 percent. Secondly, according to the principle of openness, authority, relevance and normative principle, eight COVID-19 policies are evaluated by PMC-AE model. Four policies are level I policies, three policies are level II policies and one policy is level III policies. The reason for its low score is mainly affected by four indexes: policy evaluation, incentive measures, policy emphasis and policy receptor. To sum up, China has taken both non-structural and structural measures to prevent and control the epidemic. The introduction of specific epidemic prevention and control policy has realized complex intervention in the whole process of epidemic prevention and control.

Principles and Measures for Policymaking in Crisis Management

Mining and quantitative evaluation of COVID-19 policy tools in China

Policy Dilemma and the Resolving in the Management of Public Crises

Research On Management Mechanism For The Emergent Public Crisis Event

Organizational Crisis Management and Public Policy Problem

The Research On Constructing Management Mechanism For Public Crisis In China

How To Improve The Emergency Decision-Making Ability Of Chinese Local Government

Building a Modern Crisis Management System: Organizational Behavioral Analysis

The Promise and Peril of Crisis Management in U.S.A

On Relationship between Government and Media in Public Crisis Management

Coping Strategy for Administrative Crisis Initiated by Network Opinions

Administrative Guidance Measure: an Active Role in Coping with International Financial Crisis Impact——Concurrent Discussion on Improving Government Crisis Intervention Ability by Administrative Method Innovation

Study On Building Up Scientific And Rational Emergency Management Mechanism In China

Motivations Underlining the “blame Avoidance Dilemma”: the Effect on Street-Level Bureaucrats During a Crisis

Public Crisis Communication:the Life Line with the Crisis Management

The System and Core Mechanisms of Governing Major Pandemic Crisis-a Brief Discussion

The Mechanism Research of Crisis Management in Social Group Incidents——Taking Beijing as an Example

Managing Crisis Information To Meet The Public Demands: A Strategic Approach

Being a Public Manager in Times of Crisis: the Art of Managing Stakeholders, Political Masters, and Collaborative Networks

On Warning System against Public Crises in China

The more actions, the higher the performance evaluation? Evidence from the crisis management of COVID-19 in China