Abstract:Environmental risk issues pose a threat to human life and well-being. In order to reduce environmental risks, environmental risk response strategies have become increasingly vital. As the group most affected by environmental risks, the public environmental risk coping behaviors affect the effectiveness of environmental risk management. However, the public adoption of such behaviors mainly depends on their willingness. Therefore, the key to effective governance lies in guiding the public to voluntarily adopt appropriate environmental risk coping behaviors. The theory of environmental psychology provides relevant references for this. The internal psychological motivations of the public (including attitudes and subjective norms etc.) affect their choices of environmental risk behavior. The main purpose of this research is to explore the determinants underlying environmental risk coping behaviors using extending the theory of planned behavior by additional constructs (trust, risk perception, interaction satisfaction). The research applies a questionnaire survey method to collect data from the public living in the vicinity of two locations in China—an industrial area and a waste incineration plant in a Chinese city. The result of SEM shows that the public’s trust in governments has a positive influence on the intention to collaborate, while the public’s trust in the government and enterprises is negatively correlated with their intention to engage in confrontational behavior. Also, there is a positive correlation between confrontational intention and confrontational behavior, while the intention to cooperate may not necessarily result in collaborative behavior. Risk perception is not related to trust and the intention to collaborate, but it positively affects the intention to confront. The reason for the public to willingly take collaborative actions is not because they have perceived a high level of risk, and the public’s high trust in the government can enhance their intention to take collaborative actions. It is thus clear that government credibility plays an important guiding role in public risk responsive behavior. The research findings provide policy recommendations for guiding public environmental risk coping behavior.

Motivations Underlining the “blame Avoidance Dilemma”: the Effect on Street-Level Bureaucrats During a Crisis

Motivated Reasoning and Blame: Responses to Performance Framing and Outgroup Triggers during COVID-19

To Blame is Human: A Quantitative Systematic Review of the Relationship Between Outcome Severity of Large‐Scale Crises and Attributions of Blame

New development: Administrative accountability and early responses during public health crises—lessons from Covid-19 in China

Goal reasonableness and grassroots civil servants’ blame-avoidance behavior: Roles of felt accountability and power???responsibility matching

Difficult Times, Difficult Decisions: Examining the Impact of Perceived Crisis Response Strategies During COVID-19

What Leads to Effective Emergency Management? A Configurational Analysis of Empirical Cases of Local Chinese Governments

The Impacts of Locus of Crisis Outcome Control on Responsibility Attribution in Hindsight: Focusing on Comparisons Between the American and Chinese Public

Blame avoidance in hard times: complex governance structures and the COVID-19 pandemic

Investigating the influence of risk perception on females’ public service motivation during public health emergencies

Governmental Response to Crises and Its Implications for Street-Level Implementation: Policy Ambiguity, Risk, and Discretion during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Clients' Help Deservingness, Crowd Situational Stress and Discretionary Decision-making: an Experimental Study of Regulatory Street-level Bureaucrats in China

The more actions, the higher the performance evaluation? Evidence from the crisis management of COVID-19 in China

Crisis-induced Public Demand for Regulatory Intervention in the Social Media Era: Examining the Moderating Roles of Perceived Government Controllability and Consumer Collective Efficacy

Do instructing and adjusting information make a difference in crisis responsibility attribution? Merging fear appeal studies with the defensive attribution hypothesis

Exploring Mechanisms Affecting Environmental Risk Coping Behaviors: Evidence from China

Learning from Neighbors: The Spatial Spillover Effect of Crisis Learning on Local Government

Public Expectations of Crisis Outcomes in the Social Media Era in China: A Communication-Mediated Psychological Mechanism

The Psychology of Local Officials: Explaining Strategic Behavior in the Chinese Target Responsibility System

Weaving public health and safety nets to respond the COVID-19 pandemic

Being a Public Manager in Times of Crisis: the Art of Managing Stakeholders, Political Masters, and Collaborative Networks