Abstract:Background On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to be a pandemic. This posed challenges to many countries, prominent among which is communication with the public to gain their cooperation. Israel faces different challenges from other countries in its management of the COVID-19 crisis because it is in the midst of a deep constitutional crisis. Objective The objective of this paper was to examine the response of the Israeli public to the government’s emergency instructions regarding the pandemic in terms of correlations between overall risk perception and crisis management; overall risk perception and economic threat perception; crisis management and compliance with behavioral guidelines; and crisis management and economic threat perception. We also made comparisons between crisis management and spokesperson credibility and between crisis management and the credibility of information sources. Methods The sample was established using an online survey that enabled rapid and effective distribution of an online questionnaire during the COVID-19 crisis. The self-selection online survey method of nonprobability sampling was used to recruit participants (N=1056) through social network posts asking the general public (aged ≥18 years) to answer the survey. Results Participants aged ≥65 years perceived higher personal risk compared to those aged 18-30 years (mean difference 0.33, 95% CI 0.04-0.61) and those aged 46-64 years (mean difference 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-0.64). Significant correlations were found between overall risk perception and attitudes toward crisis management (r=0.19, P<.001), overall risk perception and economic threat perception (r=0.22, P<.001), attitudes toward crisis management and compliance with behavioral guidelines (r=0.15, P<.001), and attitudes toward crisis management and economic threat perception (r=–0.15, P<.001). Participants who perceived that the prime minister was the most credible spokesperson evaluated the crisis management significantly higher than all other groups. The crisis management was evaluated significantly lower by participants who stated that infectious disease specialists were the most credible spokespersons. Participants for whom the Ministry of Health website was the most credible source of information evaluated the crisis management higher than all other groups. Participants for whom scientific articles were the most credible source of information evaluated the crisis management lower than those who perceived that the WHO/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention websites or Ministry of Health/hospital websites and health care workers were the most credible. Conclusions The higher the public trust and evaluation of crisis management, the greater the compliance of the public with guidelines. It was also found that crisis management and information cannot be approached in the same way for the overall public. Furthermore, unlike other epidemics, the COVID-19 crisis has widespread economic and social consequences; therefore, it is impossible to focus only on health risks without communicating economic and social risks as well.

Governmental Response to Crises and Its Implications for Street-Level Implementation: Policy Ambiguity, Risk, and Discretion during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Working through the fog of a pandemic: Street-level policy entrepreneurship in times of crises

How Well Do They Manage a Crisis? The Government's Effectiveness During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Understanding street-level managers’ compliance: a comparative study of policy implementation in Switzerland, Italy, Germany, and Israel

Battling COVID-19: Public Personnel Management, Trust, and Social Resilience During a Global Crisis

Policy‐making, policy‐taking, and policy‐shaping: Local government responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic

The why and how of COVID streets: a city-level review of research into motivations and approaches during a crisis

Singapore's COVID-19 crisis decision-making through centralization, legitimacy, and agility: an empirical analysis

Analysis of Public Perception of the Israeli Government’s Early Emergency Instructions Regarding COVID-19: Online Survey Study

Evaluation study of the urban governance of the COVID-19 crisis in the city of Antwerp

Difficult Times, Difficult Decisions: Examining the Impact of Perceived Crisis Response Strategies During COVID-19

Assessing Emergency Information Sharing between the Government and the Public during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Open Government Perspective

Emerging from disruptions and ambiguities: Understanding local government innovative responses during the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic

Motivations Underlining the “blame Avoidance Dilemma”: the Effect on Street-Level Bureaucrats During a Crisis

Inequalities and identity processes in crises: Recommendations for facilitating safe response to the COVID‐19 pandemic

A grounded theory-based qualitative approach for examining local implementation of public health policies during crises

Crisis management for Patient Safety Officers: lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic

Crisis management, surveillance, and digital ethics in the COVID‐19 era

The Return of Decentralization Greek Local Government Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Emotional Toll of the COVID-19 Crisis on Local Government Workers

New development: Administrative accountability and early responses during public health crises—lessons from Covid-19 in China