Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

The Innovation of Judicial Review of Death Penalty Procedure and the Procuratorial Organ’s Right to Intervene

System Construction for the Procuratorial Organs to Intervene Review Procedure of Death Penalty

District Circuit Court: An Approach of Realism——An Analysis Based on Death Penalty Review Process

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

The Protection of the Right to Defense in the Procedure for Review of Death Sentences

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

Study on Judicial Review of Investigative Power

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Improving the Full Review of the Criminal Trial of Second Instance

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

The Legal Structure and Practical Dilemma of the Establishment of the "Review System"

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

On the Procedural Designing of Review Mechanism on Civil Trials

Rethinking on Elements of Cause of Retrial

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Several Issue Discussions of Reform of System of Procedure for Supervision Upon Adjudication of Our Country

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

The Research on Supervision Mechanism of Corruption Crimes Investigation

Changes,Defects and Improvement Countermeasures on the System of Criminal Pretrial Review——Compared with Eextraterritorial Criminal Pretrial Review

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure