Abstract:Many principles controlling the modern western civil law, such as consideration, prescription and capacity, have taken shape in history. This paper, from a historical perspective, explores the logic and rationale behind Chinese common law by focusing on the formation of contract in the Qing Dynasty. The first section shows that in the Qing Dynasty, the delivering of the subject matter was a basic requirement to form a loan contract between two parties. However, an agreement for transferring the item in advance worked as a consensual and bilateral contract, and the aggrieved party could ask for compensation or contractual fine or retain the deposit when the other party broke the contract. The second section argues that in the Qing Dynasty, the writing of a loan contract (Shuqi) is not a contract in and of itself, but is only one of the forms of contracts. The writing worked as the primary evidence of the existence of a contract. In the third section, the requirements of consideration and prescription are used to understand the practice of civil trials in the Qing Dynasty. Back then, when the loan contracts provided by two parties entailed some defects, the judges would adjudicate a loan dispute on the basis of consideration, with an assumption that people acted in their own interest and only in this sense were their acts rational. The judges could also identify the right(s) of parties due to the lapse of time. The fourth section argues against the view that equality was not used as a principle to form civil contracts in Chinese history. In Ancient China, there was indeed inequality between officials and laymen and within family or clan. However, in the Qing Dynasty, the different social status of the parties had little to do with the formation of contract. The restrictions for junior individuals (e.g. beiyou) to dispose his family property were actually restrictions on their capability instead of limitations on his capacity to enjoy private right or to have private obligation.

Traditional Consuetude Pawn and Its Reconstruction in the Written Civil Code

The Social Construction Logic of Property Rights:A review on the property rights studies of Chinese sociologists from the perspective of game theory

The Alternation and Changes of National Models Based on Land property Rights

The Historical Position of Collective Land Ownership

Outline of the Institutions for Land Transactions in Traditional China

The transfer of "Incomplete Property Rights":A Study of the "Deed Back" of Shicang(1728-1949)

The Study On"the JiuShu of Wang's Pawn Industry

The Owners under the Property Law of Mainland China

The Normative Structure of "Dingliches Rechtsgeschaeft" and the Transfer of Ownership in China

DISCOVERING THE CHINESE COMMON LAW: THE FORMATION OF THE LOAN CONTRACT IN THE QING DYNASTY

The Study on the Attribution of Fruits before the Civil Code Era:An Explanation Adherence to Systems

Reconstruction of China’s Farmland Rights System Based on the ‘trifurcation of Land Rights’ Reform

Filial Piety across Legal Systems: Analysing the Influence of Traditional Chinese Legal Culture of Property in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China

A Historical Perspective on the Unification of Private Law and the Future of the Civil Code

Parent-Child Relationship in the Civil Code of China

Reformation, Inheritance and the Evolvement of Law: A Cultural Analysis of Confucianization of the Ancient Chinese Laws

Concerns about the Form of Legislation on Civil Laws

New Thinking of Wealth Management Under Civil Code Implementation - Based on Family Risk Identification and Legal Protection

An Argument over "Monistic Object" Doctrine of Relations Regulated by Civil Legislation: On China' s Appropriate Choice

The Characteristics of Mortgage Rights through the Chinese Civil Code

Why Does the Evolution of the Traditional China Have the Characteristics of the Ultrastable System