Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

The Alternation and Changes of National Models Based on Land property Rights

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

The Social Construction Logic of Property Rights:A review on the property rights studies of Chinese sociologists from the perspective of game theory

Nation and Governance——Government Monopoly on the Market in China's History and Its Political Cause

The Historical Position of Collective Land Ownership

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

An Analysis on the Nature of Chinese Land Property Rights and Its Trajectory of Reform

Outline of the Institutions for Land Transactions in Traditional China

How to Explain Corporate Investment Heterogeneity in China's New Normal: Structural Models with State-Owned Property Rights

Equalization of Land Property Rights and Marketization of the Production Factors:Historical Comparison and Theoretical Enlightenment

Path Choice for the Reform of Land Property and Its Transfer Policies

State fragmentation and rights contestation: Rural land development rights in China

A Political Economy Pattern Of China'S History: On Revolution, Reform, And Involution Under Dictatorship

An Institutional Analysis of China's State Power Structure and its Operation

The Model Construction and Path Exploration of Ruling by Law

A Discussion on Some Issues of Traditional Land-Renting System

Alteration of Territories in Eastern Jin,the Sixteen Kingdoms and the Northern and Southern Dynasties

Relax to Enslavement under the Conflict Between Central Integrated Community and Community--On Economic History in a Long Period

Alternative Governance Model for Historical Building Conservation in China: From Property Rights Perspective

Social Integration and Theories of Market Transformation

The Confucian Legalist Stateand Theory Building Based on Ideal-Type Set