Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

Supervision Risk,Auditor Size and Audit Quality

Study on Foreign Research about Auditor Quality:The Impact of Demand and Supply

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Two Dimensional Research Paradigms of Auditor Quality and Review

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

A Structuralist Analysis on the Determinants of Audit Market Structure

The scale and scope of the client portfolio and audit quality at the individual auditor level: evidence from China

On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China

Impact of Auditor Turnover on Stock Price Crash Risk: Insights from China's Capital Market

Abnormal Audit Fees, Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality

Capital Market Consequences of Audit Office Size: Evidence from Stock Price Crash Risk

Auditor size and audit quality

A Research on Building a Perfect Accounting Supervision

The Negative Effect of Regional Banking Competition on Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Do Professional Risk Funds Affect Audit Quality?

Does Audit Quality Matter to Credit Rating in China Corporate Bond Market

Does the supervisory ability of internal audit executives affect the occurrence of corporate fraud? Evidence from small and medium-sized listed enterprises in China

How does finance and accounting supervision affect stock price crash risk?

Comparative Study on the Impact of Auditor Rotation Regulation