Abstract:Context: Sectional matrix systems, namely, Garrison and Bioclear with contact rings, are valuable aids to establish proximal contact tightness and contours in Class II composite restorations when compared with the circumferential matrix system Tofflemire. Aims: This study aimed to compare the proximal contact and contours of Class II restoration in premolars and molars restored with Tofflemire, Garrison, and Bioclear matrix system by FDI criteria of approximal anatomical form using floss or 25-µm metal blade and radiographic examination. Subjects and methods: Sixty Class II patients were selected, and a preoperative bitewing radiograph was taken. Initially, caries removal was done by round diamond bur, followed by 245 carbide bur. Samples were divided randomly into three groups based on the type of matrix system used for restoration. Group 1 (n = 20): Tofflemire, Group 2 (n = 20): Garrison matrix system, and Group 3 (n = 20): Bioclear matrix system. Matrix systems were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, and composite restoration was done. The clinical evaluation of proximal contact and contour was done by a blinded observer immediately after placement of composite restoration using FDI criteria by passing dental floss or 25-µm metal blade, whereas marginal gaps and overhangs were checked using a radiograph. Results were statistically analyzed. Statistical analysis used: The statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows, Version 19.0). Descriptive statistics was calculated as frequency and percentage. The comparison of characteristics of the contact points, contour, and radiographic examination was carried out using the Chi-square test. Multiple comparisons were done by comparing column proportions with Bonferroni adjustments. The level of significance for the present study was fixed at P < 0.05. Results: There were significantly higher proportions of normal contacts in Garrison (60%) and Bioclear (70%) compared to that in the Tofflemire (20%) matrix system (Bioclear > Garrison > Tofflemire). Comparison of contours showed normal contours with Garrison (50%), Bioclear (50%), and Tofflemire (15%) matrix system (Bioclear = Garrison > Tofflemire). In radiographic examination, harmonious transitions between the restoration and the tooth were similar in Garrison (30%) and Bioclear (30%) compared to the Tofflemire (15%) matrix system (Bioclear = Garrison > Tofflemire). Conclusions: Garrison and Bioclear sectional matrix systems established superior contacts and contours than the Tofflemire circumferential system.

Influence of Different Matrix Systems and Resin Composites on the Proximal Contacts of Class Ⅱ Resin Composite Restorations

Influence of luting agents on fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors with metal posts

Comparison of proximal contact and contours of class II restoration in premolars and molars restored with three different matrix systems using FDI criteria: An in vivo study

Evaluating the Proximal Contact Tightness in Direct or In-direct Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Randomized Clinical Trial

In vitro Comparison of the Efficiency of Celluloid and Metallic Matrices in Proximal Restorations with a Bulk Polymer-based Biomaterial

[Effect of composite restoration on the reinforcement of teeth]

Effects of the lining material, thickness and coverage on residual stress of class II molar restorations by multilayer technique

Influence of fiber post on endodontically-treated molars restored with resin-based composite：a finite element analysis

A comparison of the mechanical proprieties of different types of primary tooth restorations: an in vitro study

Computer Aided Design Modelling and Finite Element Analysis of Premolar Proximal Cavities Restored with Resin Composites

[Finite Element Analysis of Tooth Restored with One-Piece of Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacturing Zirconia Post-Core in Three Different Radiuses].

Operators’ Ease and Satisfaction in Restoring Class II Cavities With Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix System at Qassim University Dental Clinics

Optimizing restorative procedure and material selection for pulpotomized primary molars: Mechanical characterization by 3D finite element analysis

[Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of One-Piece Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacture Involved Zirconia Post and Core].

Clinical Observation of the Restoration of Computer Aided Designed and Manufactured One-Piece Zirconia Posts and Cores: a 5-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study

The Stress Analysis on Filling and Full Crown Restoration of the Structure Defect of the First Mandibular Molar

Comparison of Bulk Polymeric Resin Composite and Hybrid Glass Ionomer Cement in Adhesive Class I Dental Restorations: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

An In Vitro Investigation Of Wear Resistance And Hardness Of Composite Resins

Fracture Resistance Of Root Filled Premolar Teeth Restored With Direct Composite Resin With Or Without Cusp Coverage

[Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with One-Piece Computer Aided Design and Manufacture Zirconia Posts and Cores: an in Vitro Study].

Bonding States of In Vitro Class 2 Direct Resin Composite Restoration Applied by Various Incremental Techniques