Limitation and Transcendence of the Humanities and Social Sciences Evaluation

LIU Da-chun
2007-01-01
Abstract:Presently many controversies and hostile opinions have been put forward about the evaluation of the humanities and social sciences.Along with the economicalization of academic researches,expert system and peer review are subjected to more outside interference in China,and the evaluator does not play its original role.Reasonable as it is to some extent,the evaluation method of qualification is just a management tool with confined function,namely,only providing a reference in the academic activity.In the particular environment of China,the official-oriented and over-bureaucratized academic organizations have hindered academic independence and caused academic corruption.The further development of the humanities and social sciences requires its corresponding evaluation system that usually develops posteriorly and functions restrictedly.Since there are often many outstanding achievements disagreeing with the evaluation standard,this basic limitation of evaluation system has to be well borne in mind to get just and sound evaluation results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?