Abstract:Academic journal is an important medium of research publication and academic exchange.The academic journal evaluation system in China has been initially established,but quality and innovativeness evaluations are still weak.There are profound socio-economic,cultural,administrative reasons for this problem,which have caused negative impact on the value orientation of scholars and their research behavior,affected the objectivity and impartiality of academic evaluation,and undermined the cleanness and pureness of the academia. Scholars of the humanities and social sciences and library and information science experts have already reached a consensus that academic evaluation in the humanities and social sciences should be more diverse,localized and content-based,and there should be quality and innovativeness evaluations.In the past dozen years,academic journal evaluation is mainly quantitative and formal,but now more emphasis should be placed on content evaluation and innovativeness evaluation to create a fair and free environment for academic journal evaluation. On the premise of maintaining the reasonable elements in the existing academic journal evaluation system,this article proposes a combination of three new concepts including formal evaluation,content evaluation and effectiveness evaluation,and puts forward a new evaluation method integrating peer-review and bibliometric evaluation.The proposed combination of the three new concepts would be able to explain the history and the current situation of journal evaluation,and also predict its future.The aim of the new thinking and the approach to realize it is to overcome the institutional obstacles that hinder the healthy development of academic evaluation,to establish a fair and rational academic environment for scholars,and to create an open and constructive academic environment in the future.

Humanities and Social Science Research Evaluation at Agricultural and Forestry Universities: Status-quo and Reflections

Overseas Students in Agriculture and the Development of Higher Agricultural Disciplines in Modern China

On Building Evaluation System of Humanities and Social Sciences

International University Evaluation:Value and Choice

Evaluation of Universities in China:An Institutionalist Analysis

Academic Evaluation of Social Sciences in US and UK

Problems of Faculty Evaluation in Universities of China ——Based on the Perspective of Human Resource

A Study on the Evaluation Model for Outstanding Scholars in Humanities and Social Sciences

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

The Comparison of the Characteristics of Higher Education's Quality Evaluation and the Evaluation Mechanism of Social Agency Between China and Japan

The Undergraduate Teaching Evaluation System in China: Progress, Problems and Suggestions

ON THE EVALUATION MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AND THEIR GAUGING SYSTEM IN COLLEGES/DEPARTMENTS OF UNIVERSITIES

Current Status of Evaluations on Ecological Benefits of Urban Forest:Surveying on Urban Forestry Administrative Authorities

The Construction of the Evaluation System on Domestic Papers in Humanities and Social Science

A revised integrated framework to evaluate the sustainability of given cropping systems

Research Progress of Landscape Evaluation

The structure and evaluation of educational research skills and accomplishments among rural teachers: Data from China

Study on the Construction of Academic Evaluation System of Applied Undergraduate University Based on Social Needs

Disciplinary Development of Chinese Research Universities: Reflection from International Perspective

A Review of Research on Performance Evaluation in the Colleges and Universities of China

A Study on Evaluation Indicator System for Journals of Humanities and Social Science