Comparative analysis on three-dimensional assessment of breast invasive ductal carcinoma by conventional ultrasound and automated breast volume scanner
Yingdong XIE,Chaoli XU,Shuping WEI,Guo SUN,Bin YANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2016.06.009
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the accuracy of conventional utrasonography(US) and automated breast volume scanner(ABVS) in three-dimensional assessment of primary breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Methods Fifty-two patients with invasive ductal carcinoma were included in our study. The maximal tumor diameter(MD), the tumor volume(TV) and surface area (TSA) were calculated by US and ABVS. The volume measures were also obtained from ABVS data with a software dedicated to 3D reconstruction(Materialise ’ s interactive medical image control system 17 . 0 , Mimics). The two-dimensional and three-dimensional parameters of US and ABVS, and Mimics volume were evaluated by calculating correlation coefficients when compared with pathological measurements. Taking T2 classification as the critical point, the accuracy of the measurements for predicting T2 classification was analyzed by the ROC curves, and the statistical significant differences were tested. Results The correlation coefficient of MD, TV and TSA of US and pathology was 0.543,0.639,0.650(all P=0.000), and the area under the ROC curves of these three parameters were 0.777,0.767,0.793.The correlation coefficient of MD, TV and TSA of ABVS and pathology was 0.736,0.820,0.830(all P=0.000), and the area under the ROC curves of these three parameters was 0.885, 0.921, 0.902,respectively. The correlation coefficient of Mimics volume and pathology was 0.856(P=0.000),and the area under the ROC curves was 0.938. The accuracy of ABVS in measurement of volume and area was higher than that of US, there was significant difference(P=0 . 018 , 0 . 040), while there was no significant difference in measurement of MD . Conclusion There are no statistical significant differences between two-dimensional and three-dimensional parameters. However,the accuracy of three-dimensional parameters is higher than two-dimensional parameters. The accuracy of ABVS measurements is higher than US with statistical significant differences. ABVS is a reliable tool for three-dimensional measurements, which allows a more accurate morphologic and biological description of the lesions.