Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

On Criminal Judicial Application of Customary Law

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

"Typical Cases" As an Informal Legal Source in the Administrative Law

The Reconsideration of Customary Law Research

Criminalization and Decriminalization in Judicature

Chinese Mode of Illegal Evidences' Exclusion

Ruling on Application for Documentary Evidence Collection: A Comparison of Modes

Discussion on the Application and Improvement of Criminal Trial by Default in China

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

Criminal Judicial Bad Effect and Improvement Brought by Traditional Law Culture

Evaluation and Analysis of Traditional Customary Law Based on the Perspective of Big Data

A Study of the Yao Nationality's Customary Law on Criminal Punishment

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

The Relationship between Rural Customary Law and National Statutory Law

Study on Criminal Jurisprudence: Western Countries' Experience and China's Reality

Imported Rules and Traditional Customs in the Process of Legal Modernization:The Case of Sacrificial Fields

Basic Principles in Criminal Evidence Law

Common Sense and Local Judicatory in Traditional China:Thinking from a Complicated Case

Criminal defense in Chinese courtrooms: an empirical inquiry

The Specific Provisions of Criminal Code and the Basic Theory of Criminal Law' s Interpretation