Abstract:BackgroundPatients’ perceptions of care quality within and across settings are important for the further development of palliative care. The aim was to investigate patients’ perceptions of palliative care quality within settings, including perceptions of care received and their subjective importance, and contrast palliative care quality across settings.MethodA cross-sectional study including 191 patients in late palliative phase (73 % response rate) admitted to hospice inpatient care, hospice day care, palliative units in nursing homes, and home care was conducted, using the Quality from the Patients’ Perspective instrument-palliative care (QPP-PC). QPP-PC comprises four dimensions and 12 factors; “medical–technical competence” (MT) (2 factors), “physical–technical conditions” (PT) (one factor), “identity–orientation approach” (ID) (4 factors), “sociocultural atmosphere” (SC) (5 factors), and three single items (S); medical care, personal hygiene and atmosphere. Data were analysed using paired-samples t-test and analysis of covariance while controlling for differences in patient characteristics.ResultsPatients’ perceptions of care received within settings showed high scores for the factors and single items “honesty” (ID) and “atmosphere” (S) in all settings and low scores for “exhaustion” (MT) in three out of four settings. Patients’ perceptions of importance scored high for “medical care” (S), “honesty” (ID), “respect and empathy” (ID) and “atmosphere” (S) in all settings. No aspects of care scored low in all settings. Importance scored higher than perceptions of care received, in particular for receiving information. Patients’ perceptions of care across settings differed, with highest scores in hospice inpatient care for the dimensions; ID, SC, and “medical care” (S), the SC and “atmosphere” (S) for hospice day care, and “medical care” (S) for palliative units in nursing homes. There were no differences in subjective importance across settings.ConclusionStrengths of services related to identity–orientation approach and a pleasant and safe atmosphere. Key areas for improvement related to receiving information. Perceptions of subjective importance did not differ across settings, but perceptions of care received scored higher in more care areas for hospice inpatient care, than in other settings. Further studies are needed to support these findings, to investigate why perceptions of care differ across settings and to highlight what can be learned from settings receiving high scores.

Psychological Well-Being and Quality of Care: a Factor-Analytic Examination of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale.

A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)

Measuring quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities: Psychometric evaluation of the personal outcomes scale in the United Kingdom

Cognitive testing of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale (C-POS) with children, young people and their parents/carers

Relevance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Cancer: Detection of Underrated Psychological Distress of Palliative Care Patients in an Outpatient Setting

Impact of Symptom Distress on the Quality of Life of Oncology Palliative Care Patients: A Portuguese Cross-Sectional Study

Validation of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in adults with cystic fibrosis

Validation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) – Japanese Version

Psychometric testing of the caring for the caregiver survey for healthcare providers

Psychometric properties of the FACT-G quality of life scale for family caregivers of cancer patients

Quality of life, psychological burden, needs, and satisfaction during specialized inpatient palliative care in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients

Patients’ perceptions of palliative care quality in hospice inpatient care, hospice day care, palliative units in nursing homes, and home care: a cross-sectional study

The relationships between the combination of person- and organization-related conditions and patients' perceptions of palliative care quality

Psychological well-being of palliative care professionals: Who cares?

The development and psychometric evaluation of the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome-Scale (MH-NURSE-POS) for inpatient psychiatric hospital settings

Rasch analysis of the perceptions of palliative care instrument (PPCI) in patients with advanced cancer

Using a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Physical, Psychosocial, and Existential Issues in COPD

Factorial structure of a scale: Strategies Used by People to Promote Health--Chinese version

A 4-Factor Perspective of the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS): a Deeper Understanding of Patient-Centredness

Palliative Performance Scale (PPS): A New Tool

Examining the Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Quality of Life Scale among People with Multiple Sclerosis