Abstract:Objectives: To produce a robust measure of social inclusion [Social and Community Opportunities Profile (SCOPE)] that is multidimensional and captures multiple life domains; incorporates objective and subjective indicators of inclusion; has sound psychometric properties including responsiveness; facilitates benchmark comparisons with normative general population and mental health samples [including common mental disorder (CMD) and severe mental illness groups]; can be used with people with mental health problems receiving support from mental health services or not; and can be used across a range of community service settings. Design: Phase I: conceptual framework developed from a review of the literature and concept mapping. Phase II: questionnaire developed including UK national population surveys and other normative data. Pre-testing using cognitive appraisal and evaluation then pilot testing in a small convenience sample. Preliminary testing (following modification) in community (n = 252) and mental health service users (MHSUs) samples (n = 43). Data reduction including factor analysis and Mokken scaling for polytomous item response analysis then psychometric evaluation, including internal consistency and discriminant and construct validity. Test-retest reliability assessed in a convenience sample of students (n = 119). Final testing in clinical services including psychometric evaluation and responsiveness testing. Setting: The community sample was set in participants' households across the UK. The MHSU sample was set in a south Wales resource centre. The student sample was set in a university. Participants: The community sample was randomly selected from the postal address file in five areas in England and Wales. Forty people in this sample were subgrouped as having a CMD based on their responses to the Mental Health Index five items. Two MHSU samples were obtained from existing services. Results: Psychometric testing on the field data from the SCOPE long version demonstrated good internal consistency of all scales (alpha ≥ 0.7), good construct validity, with SCOPE scales correlating highly with each other sharing between 40% and 61% of variance and a close but lesser association with community participation and social capital. Chi-squared tests on objective items and analysis of variance between groups on SCOPE scales demonstrated good discriminant validity between different mental health groups (and better than the Mokken scaling results). Acceptability was good, with 77% of the service user sample finding the SCOPE domains relevant. The number of items in SCOPE decreased from 121 to 48 following data reduction. Scales in the short version of SCOPE retained reasonable internal consistency (alpha between 0.60 and 0.75). Test-retest reliability demonstrated reliability over time, with strong associations between all items over a 2-week period. Repeating the discriminant validity tests on the short version demonstrates good discriminant validity between the mental health groups. Acceptability improved, with 90% of the sample describing questions as relevant to them. Conclusions: The main aim of producing an instrument with good psychometric properties for use in research and clinical settings, namely the SCOPE short version, was achieved. Ongoing data collection will enable responsiveness testing in the future. Further research is needed including larger samples of minority and disadvantaged groups, including those with physical illnesses and disabilities, and specific mental health diagnostic groups. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Measuring quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities: Psychometric evaluation of the personal outcomes scale in the United Kingdom

Understanding the Relationship between Quality of Life, Adaptive Behavior and Support Needs

Psychological Well-Being and Quality of Care: a Factor-Analytic Examination of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale.

The Quality of Care and Support (QOCS) for People with Disability Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties.

Psychometric Properties of Self-reported Quality of Life Measures for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review

Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Cognitive testing of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale (C-POS) with children, young people and their parents/carers

A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)

Psychometric properties of the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) measure

Examining the Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Quality of Life Scale among People with Multiple Sclerosis

Quality of Life in Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: The Congruency Effect between Reports

The World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument for people with intellectual and physical disabilities (WHOQOL-Dis): evidence of validity of the Brazilian version

Cross-sectional study assessing the feasibility of measuring residents′ Quality of Life in English care homes and assessing the construct validity and internal consistency of measures completed by staff-proxy.

Development and Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100) in Portugal

Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study

Do health and social support and personal autonomy have an influence on the health-related quality of life of individuals with intellectual disability?

Longitudinal Validity and Reliability of the Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale (mypos) Was Established Using Traditional, Generalizability and Rasch Psychometric Methods.

Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory – Patient Reported Outcome: A cognitively accessible measure of functional performance

Measuring Outcomes in Mental Health Services for Older People: An evaluation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for elderly people (HoNOS65+)

Validation of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in adults with cystic fibrosis

A review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy