Abstract:Background: A valid measure to describe the most important needs and concerns of people with life-threatening illnesses is missing in Cyprus. Our aim was to adapt and test the cross-cultural validity and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in a cohort of Turkish speaking cancer patients. Methods: The IPOS (English) patient-reported measure was translated into Turkish following published guidelines including, 2 independent forward, 2 independent blind backward translations, expert panel review by 7 members and field testing with 11 cognitive interviews (5 patients and 6 specialists) and final approval of the copyright holder. Consecutive cancer patients (n = 234) seen by the community palliative care services were recruited from Help Those with Cancer Society (KHYD); of those 82 were followed-up. The instrument was administered by personal interview. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to validate the factor structure of Turkish IPOS. Internal consistency reliability of the subscales was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient respectively. Validity was assessed by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between Turkish IPOS scores and Turkish version of EQ-5D-3L - a validated generic measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group. Results: Turkish IPOS is conceptually and semantically equivalent to the English version and linguistically valid. The CFA was inconclusive for the three factor structure due to low sample size, as the SRMR and CFI tests only approached the defined minimums warranting further investigation. There were low levels of missing values, and no ceiling or floor effects. The Physical (α = 0.91) and the Social and Quality of Care Issues (α = 0.75) sub-scales showed good internal consistencies, however Emotional sub-scale showed poor internal consistency (α = 0.64). The reliability of the Physical (ICC = 0.51, 0.45-0.56 95% CI) and Social Quality of Care Issues (ICC = 0.50, 0.42-0.57 95% CI) were moderate. Poor internal consistency (α =0.64) and reliability (ICC = 0.31, 0.24-0.39, 95% CI) was obtained for Emotional Subscale. Construct validity was evidenced through significant correlations in the predicted directions and strength with EQ-5D. Turkish IPOS showed higher needs and concerns in participants at more advanced stages than those at earlier stages of cancer. The standardized response mean (SRM) of - 0.94 suggested large internal responsiveness to clinical change. Conclusion: Turkish IPOS is a clear, relevant, acceptable measure and responsive to the needs and concerns of cancer patients, observing regional differences, it may have implications for use in other Turkish speaking communities. Future studies are needed to clarify the factor structure, assess its external responsiveness and to improve the properties of its Emotional subscale.

Validation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) – Japanese Version

A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)

Validation of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in adults with cystic fibrosis

Feasibility of Weekly Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) Within a Stepped Care Model

Towards patient-centred cancer care: cross-cultural validity and responsiveness of the Turkish Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale

Translation and cultural adaptation of the Greek integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS): challenges in a six-phase process

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support

Development and validation of the Comprehensive Quality of Life Outcome (CoQoLo) inventory for patients with advanced cancer

Comprehensive symptom assessment using Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale in hospitalized heart failure patients

Development and validation of a symptom illustration scale from the patient-reported outcome common terminology criteria for adverse events for patients with breast cancer

Translating, adapting, and validating the medical student version of the patient care ownership scale for use in Japan

Cognitive testing of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale (C-POS) with children, young people and their parents/carers

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire

Qualitative and Psychometric Evaluation of 29-Item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® to Assess General Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Validation study of the Japanese version of MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Brain Tumor module

Development of a Japanese version of the Pain Disability Index: translation and linguistic validation

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire

Development of a Simple Patient-reported Outcome Measurement for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Receiving Home-based Palliative Care

Effectiveness of spiritual care using spiritual pain assessment sheet for advanced cancer patients: A pilot non-randomized controlled trial

EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care: A multicentre validation study in Japan

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in community mental health service users in Japan