A comparison of ureteroscopy with open surgery in the treatment of bulbar urethral injuries

WU Guang,HOU Jianquan,LI Gang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-3685.2007.02.013
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic effect and security of ureteroscopy and open surgery in the treatment of bulbar urethral injuries.Methods Ten cases treated by ureteroscopy and 12 cases treated by direct end-to-end reanastomosis in the way of bulbar urethral injuries were retrospectively analyzed.Results Urethral strictures of the ureteroscopic group and the open surgical group had no significant difference,but the ureteroscopic group had significant shorter operation time,less blood loss,shorter hospital stay and better maximum flow rate of urine than the open surgical group(P<0.01).Conclusion The ureteroscopy is superior to open surgery in respect of therapeutic effects in the treatment of bulbar urethral injuries.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?