Treatment of benign ureteral stenosis:retrospective analysis of 90 cases in single-center

李建兴,付猛,唐宇哲,肖博,胡卫国,刘宇保,陈松,苏博兴
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2021.04.010
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To retrospectively analyze the etiology and treatment effects of ureteral stenosis.Methods:The clinical data of patients with benign ureteral strictures admitted to Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital from December 2014 to February 2018. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the length of stenotic lesions (unit: centimeter): group A (χ≤1), group B (1<χ≤2) and group C (χ>2). All patients underwent endoscopic surgery or open/laparoscopic resection of stenosis site and re-anastomosis and other urinary tract reconstruction operations.Results:There were 117 sides of stenosis treated. The methods were endoscopy and open/laparoscopic ureteroplasty. The effective rate of endoscopic treatment was 45.3% and 80.6% for open/laparoscopic ureteroplasty. The effective rate of open/laparoscopic surgery is higher than that of the endoscopic treatment (P=0.01). The effective rate in group A, B and C was 51.3%,44.1% and 63.3% respectively and there was no significant difference among them (P=0.43).Conclusions:Open/laparoscopic ureteroplasty is more effective than endoscopic treatment of benign ureteral stenosis. For some proper cases of ureteral stricture, endoscopic surgery can be the first choice of treatment. Even if the endoscopic surgery fails, open/laparoscopic ureteroplasty can still be performed in the second stage, and the treatment effect is satisfactory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?