Abstract:From the end of 2018 in China, the Big-data Driven Price Discrimination (BDPD) of online consumption raised public debate on social media. To study the consumers’ attitude about the BDPD, this study constructed a semantic recognition frame to deconstruct the Affection-Behavior-Cognition (ABC) consumer attitude theory using machine learning models inclusive of the Labeled Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Snow Natural Language Processing (NLP), based on social media comments text dataset. Similar to the questionnaires published results, this article verified that 61% of consumers expressed negative sentiment toward BDPD in general. Differently, on a finer scale, this study further measured the negative sentiments that differ significantly among different topics. The measurement results show that the topics “Regular Customers Priced High” (69%) and “Usage Intention” (67%) occupy the top two places of negative sentiment among consumers, and the topic “Precision Marketing” (42%) is at the bottom. Moreover, semantic recognition results that 49% of consumers’ comments involve multiple topics, indicating that consumers have a pretty clear cognition of the complex status of the BDPD. Importantly, this study found some topics that had not been focused on in previous studies, such as more than 8% of consumers calling for government and legal departments to regulate BDPD behavior, which indicates that quite enough consumers are losing confidence in the self-discipline of the platform enterprises. Another interesting result is that consumers who pursue solutions to the BDPD belong to two mutually exclusive groups: government protection and self-protection. The significance of this study is that it reminds the e-commerce platforms to pay attention to the potential harm for consumers’ psychology while bringing additional profits through the BDPD. Otherwise, the negative consumer attitudes may cause damage to brand image, business reputation, and the sustainable development of the platforms themselves. It also provides the government supervision departments an advanced analysis method reference for more effective administration to protect social fairness.

Review on Price Discrimination Theory

Analysis on Price Discrimination in Real-world: Chinas Cases

Price Discrimination as a Marketing Strategy

Competitive Analysis of Price Discrimination between Network and Traditional Channel

Impact of Third-Degree Price Discrimination on Welfare under the Asymmetric Price Game

The Effect of Price Discrimination on Fairness Perception and Online Hotel Reservation Intention

Analyzing Price Discrimination in Tourism Through Tripartite Evolutionary Game Theory: A Focus on Value Co-Creation

Investigating the discriminatory pricing strategy of theme parks considering visitor’s perceptions

Consumer Behavior under Benevolent Price Discrimination

Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Two-sided Markets

Prejudice, Does It Exist or Not? Consumer Price Discrimination in Minority Entrepreneurship

Network Externalities,Production Differentiation Competition and Price Discrimination

Research on Price Discrimination of Revenue Management in Restaurants ——Questionnaire Based on Perceived Fairness Evaluation from Customers

Differentiation competition of network goods, market equilibrium and price discrimination

Price Discrimination in International Airline Markets

Third-Degree Price Discrimination Versus Uniform Pricing

Price Discrimination in the Online Airline Market: An Empirical Study

Causes and Analysis of Sex Discrimination in Price Discrimination

The Limits of Interval-Regulated Price Discrimination

Research on Chinese Consumers’ Attitudes Analysis of Big-Data Driven Price Discrimination Based on Machine Learning

Who sets prices better? The impact of pricing agents on consumer negative word-of-mouth when applying price discrimination