The Limits of Interval-Regulated Price Discrimination

Kamesh Munagala,Yiheng Shen,Renzhe Xu
2024-06-10
Abstract:In this paper, we study third-degree price discrimination in a model first presented in Bergemann, Brooks, and Morris [2015]. Since such price discrimination might create market segments with vastly different posted prices, we consider regulating these prices, specifically, via restricting them to lie within an interval. Given a price interval, we consider segmentations of the market where a seller, who is oblivious to the existence of such regulation, still posts prices within the price interval. We show the following surprising result: For any market and price interval where such segmentation is feasible, there is always a different segmentation that optimally transfers all excess surplus to the consumers. In addition, we characterize the entire space of buyer and seller surplus that are achievable by such segmentation, including maximizing seller surplus, and simultaneously minimizing buyer and seller surplus.
Theoretical Economics,Data Structures and Algorithms,Computer Science and Game Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper explores the issue of third-degree price discrimination under price range regulation. Specifically, the authors investigate how to regulate prices within market segments by restricting price ranges to avoid extreme prices. The main objectives of the paper include: 1. **Consumer Optimality**: To study whether there exists a market segmentation strategy under price range regulation that makes the seller's revenue equal to that of a uniform pricing strategy, with all remaining surplus transferred to consumers. 2. **Distribution of Producer and Consumer Surplus**: To explore all possible distributions of producer surplus and consumer surplus under different market segmentation strategies and to determine the feasible region of these distributions. 3. **Active and Passive Intermediary Models**: To analyze two different scenarios—passive intermediary model (where the intermediary cannot directly control the seller's prices) and active intermediary model (where the intermediary can directly control the seller's prices), and to study the above issues under each model. ### Background and Motivation In modern e-commerce platforms, information intermediaries (such as ad exchange platforms) typically possess detailed buyer valuation information, enabling them to precisely segment buyers into different subgroups and set different pricing strategies for each subgroup. This practice can lead to significant price disparities in the market, raising concerns about social fairness and market efficiency. Therefore, the authors propose regulating such price discrimination behavior by restricting price ranges to balance the interests of consumers and producers. ### Main Contributions 1. **Consumer Optimality Theorem**: It is proven that under the passive intermediary model, for any feasible price range \( F \), there exists a market segmentation strategy that makes the seller's revenue equal to that of a uniform pricing strategy, with all remaining surplus transferred to consumers. 2. **Complete Region of Producer and Consumer Surplus**: The paper characterizes all possible distributions of producer surplus and consumer surplus under price range regulation and proves that the region formed by these distributions is a right triangle. 3. **Algorithmic Contributions**: The paper proposes algorithms for generating the aforementioned extreme points. These algorithms are highly complex in design, requiring careful selection of each market's support set to maximize revenue without violating price range restrictions. ### Conclusion By restricting price ranges, price discrimination behavior can be effectively regulated, ensuring a balance between fairness and efficiency in the market. The paper not only theoretically proves this point but also provides specific algorithmic implementations, offering guidance for practical applications.