Abstract:Copyrighted works are greatly entwined with the concept of the sharing economy because of their status as informational public goods. Unlike commercial sharing models that address tangible goods such as bikes and houses, the sharing of which is limited by their physical nature, sharing models for intangible copyrighted works such as Google Books and live game webcasting must account for the comparatively unfettered ability for these to be shared. Accordingly, these models are more focused on exploiting such works to their full commercial potential. However, these sharing models are to a large extent based on the unauthorised exploitation of copyrighted works and will be unworkable if the related copyright issues cannot be solved. The interest that copyright owners have in exclusivity must thus be balanced with the public's interest in further exploitation of copyrighted works. Article 22 of the Copyright Law of China outlines an exhaustive list of copyright exceptions; such a restrictive list is incompatible with the sharing economy. The Chinese courts have realised this problem and have gone beyond the law in their judgments, taking a cue from their US counterparts. However, many of these decisions appear to be inconsistent with one another. To address the aforementioned problems, this paper examines the latest proposed amendment to the Copyright Law of China and proposes several legislative and judicial actions that could help promote the sharing economy. At the legislative level, enacting legislation based on a refined open-ended fair use model is necessary to promote the development of the sharing economy. At the judicial level, Chinese courts should employ the concept of transformative use to correctly interpret legislation based on the proposed open-ended model. With transformative use as the cornerstone of copyright policy, the public gains the freedom to share others’ works, participate in the innovation process, and create works with new value. Moreover, authors would retain an incentive to create works under such a legal regime because market substitution will not occur if a work is used for a different expressive purpose than that for which the work was originally created. Thus, a balance can be achieved between promoting the sharing economy and protecting the exclusivity of copyright in China.

Effective Exploitation of the Copyright Restriction System Related to Library in the Digital Era

Reasonable Use and Management of the Copyright in Digital Library

A Study on Fair Use of Digital Library

Analysis of the online periodical copyright mass licensing model SWOT

Analysis of Copyright License System in The Digital Environment

Optimization of the Authorization Model of Copyright for Digital Library Based on Open Access

No Spreading of Information, No Discussion of Right——Voices and Actions in the Library Field to the Legislation Process of the Law of Internet-based Information Spreading

Ideas, Rights and Actions on Library Copyright

Principle and Stand for the Proper Treatment of Copyright in International Library Circle

To Share is Fair: the Changing Face of China's Fair Use Doctrine in the Sharing Economy and Beyond.

On the Impact of Information Network Dissemination Right on Library Information Resource Sharing

Library' Developing Digital Resources in the Coordination of Intellectual Property Rights

On the Legislative Technic of “Fair Use” in the Chinese Copyright Law Revision

Access to culture and information through library: a perspective on Chinese copyright law reformation

Study on the Copyright in Long-term Preservation of Digital Resources in Libraries from Resource Types

The New Right Limitation and Exception Rules in Chinese Copyright Law

On the network services to the disabled readers by using Right Restriction System in Copyright Law in public libraries

The Copyright Licensing Mode in the Cyber-Space in China

Comparative Analysis of Works' Statutory Licensing Systems in Chinese and American Laws

Introducing the Open Clause to Improve Copyright Flexibility in Cyberspace? Analysis and Commentary on the Proposed "Two-Step Test" in the Third Amendment to the Copyright Law of the PRC, in Comparison with the EU and the US.

Research on the System of Implied License for Copyright