Space Law and Academic Discourse:On the Several Theory Questions of China Frontier National History

ZHANG Shiming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-3600.2012.01.010
2012-01-01
Abstract:First,the author advocates to reverse thinking-orientation of viewing border from perspectives of Central Plains and to be actively engaged in discovering from frontier,analyses deep structure of nomadic society that is different from farming community.This paper argues that nomadic society's economic and political are very unstable,the key reasons of its ups and downs is that livestock breeding and crop production are essential different mechanisms.Such differences lead to two social types of nomadic and farming are different in space-time concept and even in legal structure.Secondly,the author carries out his research starting from space,explored legal status of historical territory.The paper emphasizes,the ultimate goal to research territory from law science is to clarify legal nature and legal status of territory.The study on legal status of territory is different from boundary-study.The concept of the territory in history is also different from concept Chinese historical territory.As long as two kinds of views,namely standard theory and consequence theory on China's historical territory,clarify respective operating concepts and points of disagreement,it is not necessary to continual controversy.Finally,the author puts forward his suggests about key problem to construct border study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?