Abstract:Complex nonlinear dynamics are a general characteristic of ecosystems and a challenge for scientists who seek to understand, model, and manage them. these complex dynamics can result from the interaction between endogenous feedbacks, external forcing, and noise (i.e., stochasticity) and can lead to gradual shifts, switching between alternative stable states, deterministic chaos, mirage correlations, and critical transitions. although the presence of nonlinear, state-dependent behavior means that it may not be possible able to predict the exact state of ecosystems 10–50 years from now, there remains a need for analytical tools that can address the nonlinear behaviors of real ecosystems. Such tools are important to produce accurate forecasts in the short-term, to understand key ecological mechanisms, and to enable adaptive management strategies that remain robust in response to such phenomena as climate change and invasive species. a fundamental problem with traditional modeling approaches is that they are based on parametric equations, which represent very specific hypotheses about system behavior that can be difficult to justify (Wood and thomas 1999). Moreover, these models often make simplifying assumptions (e.g., that systems are at equilibrium, different interactions are linearly separable) that do not line up with the known nonlinear reality. Consequently, these models can lack the flexibility to predict future behavior even when they are able to fit the observed data. For example, in nonlinear systems, correlations between variables may not be detectable even if they are dynamically coupled (fig. 1). thus, variables can appear correlated for the duration of a research study, but this correlation may vanish even though the dynamics have not changed. one alternative to conventional parametric models is the framework of empirical Dynamic Modeling (eDM), which does not assume any particular set of equations for the relationships between variables, but instead reconstructs behavior directly from time series data. eDM is based on takens’ theorem (takens 1981) and the method of time delay embedding (Packard et al. 1980), which enables it to describe dynamical relationships that are too complex or subtle to capture in a simple set of equations. a brief description of the methods can be found in this short animation: http://simplex. ucsd.edu/eDM_101_rMM.mov. in addition to the basic methodology of eDM, different techniques have been developed that extend the approach for specific applications: testing for the influ0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 A B C

Nonlinear Science and Its Application in Psychology

Current situation and prospects of neuro information systems

Developments and Applications of Nonlinear Principal Component Analysis – a Review

An Intelligent Model with Chaos and Causality

Recent Developments in Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamics and Control

Nonlinear Quantum Neuro-Psycho-Dynamics with Topological Phase Transitions

Social Cognitive Neuroscience:Approach,Research and the Future

A New Neural Network Model And Its Application

Big Data and Psychology in China

Nonlinear Regression Analysis

Artificial Intelligence, Chaos, Prediction and Understanding in Science

Where is all the nonlinearity: flexible nonlinear modeling of behaviorally relevant neural dynamics using recurrent neural networks

Navigating Nonlinear Analysis and Artificial Intelligence Frontiers for Revolutionary Technology Solutions

The Experimental Design of Nonlinear System

Beyond linearity in neuroimaging: Capturing nonlinear relationships with application to longitudinal studies

Predicting the Future in a nonlinear World

Psychiatry and the new dynamics

Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods

Louis Sander and Contemporary Psychoanalysis: Nonlinear Dynamic Systems, Developmental Research, Clinical Process and the Search for Core Principles

Applications of Chaos Theories to Psychiatry: A Review and Future Perspectives

Data Based Identification and Prediction of Nonlinear and Complex Dynamical Systems