Abstract:Complex nonlinear dynamics are a general characteristic of ecosystems and a challenge for scientists who seek to understand, model, and manage them. these complex dynamics can result from the interaction between endogenous feedbacks, external forcing, and noise (i.e., stochasticity) and can lead to gradual shifts, switching between alternative stable states, deterministic chaos, mirage correlations, and critical transitions. although the presence of nonlinear, state-dependent behavior means that it may not be possible able to predict the exact state of ecosystems 10–50 years from now, there remains a need for analytical tools that can address the nonlinear behaviors of real ecosystems. Such tools are important to produce accurate forecasts in the short-term, to understand key ecological mechanisms, and to enable adaptive management strategies that remain robust in response to such phenomena as climate change and invasive species. a fundamental problem with traditional modeling approaches is that they are based on parametric equations, which represent very specific hypotheses about system behavior that can be difficult to justify (Wood and thomas 1999). Moreover, these models often make simplifying assumptions (e.g., that systems are at equilibrium, different interactions are linearly separable) that do not line up with the known nonlinear reality. Consequently, these models can lack the flexibility to predict future behavior even when they are able to fit the observed data. For example, in nonlinear systems, correlations between variables may not be detectable even if they are dynamically coupled (fig. 1). thus, variables can appear correlated for the duration of a research study, but this correlation may vanish even though the dynamics have not changed. one alternative to conventional parametric models is the framework of empirical Dynamic Modeling (eDM), which does not assume any particular set of equations for the relationships between variables, but instead reconstructs behavior directly from time series data. eDM is based on takens’ theorem (takens 1981) and the method of time delay embedding (Packard et al. 1980), which enables it to describe dynamical relationships that are too complex or subtle to capture in a simple set of equations. a brief description of the methods can be found in this short animation: http://simplex. ucsd.edu/eDM_101_rMM.mov. in addition to the basic methodology of eDM, different techniques have been developed that extend the approach for specific applications: testing for the influ0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 A B C

Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods

The human ECG - nonlinear deterministic versus stochastic aspects

Surrogate time series

Fourier phase index for extracting signatures of determinism and nonlinear features in time series

Sparse Time Frequency Representations and Dynamical Systems

Uncertain nonlinear time series analysis with applications to motion analysis and epidemic spreading

Nonlinear Dynamics in Complexity Quantification

Fractal, Entropic And Chaotic Approaches To Complex Physiological Time Series Analysis: A Critical Appraisal

Nonlinear multivariate analysis of Neurophysiological Signals

Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: Applications for Prediction of Weather and Climate

Predicting the Future in a nonlinear World

Data Based Identification and Prediction of Nonlinear and Complex Dynamical Systems

Elements of nonlinear analysis of information streams

Multiscale measures of phase-space trajectories

Time Property and Its Research Progress on Biomedical Signal Time Series

Data-based prediction and causality inference of nonlinear dynamics

Can the analytic techniques of nonlinear dynamics distinguish periodic, random and chaotic signals?

Identifying phase synchronization clusters in spatially extended dynamical systems

Reconstructing Nonlinear Dynamical Systems from Multi-Modal Time Series

Nonlinear forecasting of the generalised Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation

Description of stochastic and chaotic series using visibility graphs