Abstract:The concept of learning has multiple interpretations, ranging from acquiring knowledge or skills to constructing meaning and social development. Machine Learning (ML) is considered a branch of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and develops algorithms that can learn from data and generalize their judgment to new observations by exploiting primarily statistical methods. The new millennium has seen the proliferation of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), a formalism able to reach extraordinary achievements in complex problems such as computer vision and natural language recognition. In particular, designers claim that this formalism has a strong resemblance to the way the biological neurons operate. This work argues that although ML has a mathematical/statistical foundation, it cannot be strictly regarded as a science, at least from a methodological perspective. The main reason is that ML algorithms have notable prediction power although they cannot necessarily provide a causal explanation about the achieved predictions. For example, an ANN could be trained on a large dataset of consumer financial information to predict creditworthiness. The model takes into account various factors like income, credit history, debt, spending patterns, and more. It then outputs a credit score or a decision on credit approval. However, the complex and multi-layered nature of the neural network makes it almost impossible to understand which specific factors or combinations of factors the model is using to arrive at its decision. This lack of transparency can be problematic, especially if the model denies credit and the applicant wants to know the specific reasons for the denial. The model's "black box" nature means it cannot provide a clear explanation or breakdown of how it weighed the various factors in its decision-making process. Secondly, this work rejects the belief that a machine can simply learn from data, either in supervised or unsupervised mode, just by applying statistical methods. The process of learning is much more complex, as it requires the full comprehension of a learned ability or skill. In this sense, further ML advancements, such as reinforcement learning and imitation learning denote encouraging similarities to similar cognitive skills used in human learning.

Artificial Intelligence, Chaos, Prediction and Understanding in Science

An Intelligent Model with Chaos and Causality

Prediction and Inference: From Models and Data to Artificial Intelligence

Data-driven prediction in dynamical systems: recent developments

Computational principles of intelligence: learning and reasoning with neural networks

Machine Learning for predicting chaotic systems

The Universal Arrow of Time V-VI: (Part V) Unpredictable dynamics (Part VI) Future of artificial intelligence - Art, not Science: Practical Application of Unpredictable Systems

Data Based Identification and Prediction of Nonlinear and Complex Dynamical Systems

The Automated Laplacean Demon: How ML Challenges Our Views on Prediction and Explanation

On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence

Non-equilibrium physics: from spin glasses to machine and neural learning

Scientific intuition inspired by machine learning generated hypotheses

Advanced fractional calculus, differential equations and neural networks: analysis, modeling and numerical computations

The principle of uncertainty in biology: Will machine learning/artificial intelligence lead to the end of mechanistic studies?

Machine learning and the physical sciences

Data-driven predictions in the science of science

Understanding Machine Learning Paradigms through the Lens of Statistical Thermodynamics: A tutorial

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Learning in Artificial Intelligence

The Challenges of Machine Learning: A Critical Review