Rust Layer Structure and Corrosion Resistance of High Strength Microalloyed Steels

Y. T. Zhao,S. W. Yang,H. Guo,X. M. Wang,C. J. Shang,X. L. He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.539-543.4774
2007-01-01
Materials Science Forum
Abstract:Corrosion behavior and corrosion resistance of two laboratory prepared microalloyed steels (steel 1 and steel 2) and a commercial traditional weathering steel (TWS) was compared. All these steels contain 0.03% C, 0.50% Si, 1.35%Mn, 0.30%Mo, 0.030Nb, 0.35%Cu%, 0.30%Ni and 0.040%Ti. In addition, steel 1 contains 0.0028%B, steel 2 contains 0.0026%B, 0.66%Cr, TWS contains 0.63%Cr. It has been found that a noticeable change occurs in optical microstructures attributed to a very little amount of boron. The mechanical properties of steel 2 are much better than that of TWS. The corrosion behavior of the three steels has been investigated by an alternating wet-dry experiment. Small amount of pearlite appears in TWS, which lead to its higher corrosion rate. The corrosion depth of steel 2 is nearly thrice that of steel 1. The compound components of inner rust in steel 1 and steel 2 are similar. The Nyquist diagrams indicate that the corrosion rate of steel 1 is controlled by the diffusion of oxygen in rust layer while it in steel 2 is controlled by chemical reaction in rust, which result in loosened rust layer and higher corrosion rate to steel 2. Addition of chromium cannot enhance the corrosion resistance of steel, but reduce the corrosion resistance in environments with high levels of chlorides.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?