Abstract:Nativists inspired by Chomsky are apt to provide arguments with the following general form: languages exhibit interesting generalizations that are not suggested by casual (or even intensive) examination of what people actually say; correspondingly, adults (i.e., just about anyone above the age of four) know much more about language than they could plausibly have learned on the basis of their experience; so absent an alternative account of the relevant generalizations and speakers' (tacit) knowledge of them, one should conclude that there are substantive “universal” principles of human grammar and, as a result of human biology, children can only acquire languages that conform to these principles. According to Pullum and Scholz, linguists need not suppose that children are innately endowed with “specific contingent facts about natural languages.” But Pullum and Scholz don't consider the kinds of facts that really impress nativists. Nor do they offer any plausible acquisition scenarios that would culminate in the acquisition of languages that exhibit the kinds of rich and interrelated generalizations that are exhibited by natural languages. As we stress, good poverty-of-stimulus arguments are based on specific principles – confirmed by drawing on (negative and crosslinguistic) data unavailable to children – that help explain a range of independently established linguistic phenomena. If subsequent psycholinguistic experiments show that very young children already know such principles, that strengthens the case for nativism; and if further investigation shows that children sometimes “try out” constructions that are unattested in the local language, but only if such constructions are attested in other human languages, then the case for nativism is made stronger still. We illustrate these points by considering an apparently disparate – but upon closer inspection, interestingly related – cluster of phenomena involving: negative polarity items, the interpretation of ‘or’, binding theory, and displays of Romance and Germanic constructions in Child-English.

Can Parameters Still Hold Water?

Downward Entailment in Child Mandarin

Interface Conditions in Child Language: A View from Mandarin Chinese

Children's Interpretation of Focus Expressions in English and Mandarin

Wh-Questions, Universal Statements and Free Choice Inferences in Child Mandarin.

Sometimes Children Are As Good As Adults: the Pragmatic Use of Prosody in Children'S On-Line Sentence Processing

Categorical Acquisition: Parameter-Setting in Universal Grammar

Major Inquiry Paradigms of Language Testing Research and Future Trends

[First language acquisition research and theories of language acquisition]

Some Reflections on Language Planning As a Discipline Chinese Full Text

Rethinking foundations of language from a multidisciplinary perspective

How the Chinese language encourages the paradigm shift toward discourse in linguistics

Why language acquisition is a snap

Systematicity and Arbitrariness In Language

The Main Factors That Have Effects on the Learners' Acquisition of Interlanguage Pragmatics

Psychological Mechanism of Chinese Sentence Production:The State of the Art

A Review of the Critical Period Hypothesis in Second Language Acquisition

Language learning from positive evidence, reconsidered: A simplicity-based approach

Grammatical Parameters from a Gene-like Code to Self-Organizing Attractors

Non-linguistic Effects on the Development of Pragmatic Competence in the EFL Setting

A parametric approach to the acquisition of syntax