Abstract:According to Fillmore (1982) and Lakoff (1987), folk theories such as pragmatic experience and cultural knowledge about the world can be theoretically captured as frames (Fillmore) and ICMs (Lakoff) and may not look strictly scientific. However, as ICM successfully incorporates both denotational and representational sides of meaning, it may well help to depict some language phenomena which cannot be fully described within formal approaches. In this paper, therefore, we argue that semiotic relationship may not be totally objective. Ontological entities (O) may not be directly mapped epistemologically onto the symbolic system in the form of E but may rather give rise to corresponding ECs as organic combinations of epistemological counterpart of O and cognitive factors such as imagination, image schema, etc. We believe that this way of theorization enjoys priority over formal approaches in analyzing zero subject (○) phenomenon in Chinese. Furthermore, ○ can be subcategorized into ○e type (zero exophora) and ○a type (zero anaphora). These are different from empty syntactic categories such as e, t, pro and PRO. In linguistic literature, zero anaphora is usually studied in a [Xr ← A] framework. Yet, zero anaphora in general and first person zero anaphora in particular in Chinese boasts of a number of other analytic possibilities such as [Xr ← ○a],[○e← ○a], etc. and the length of the chain could be excessively great. This gives rise to an A model (anaphoric), a B model (inferential) and a C model (grammatical) in the description of the ○ phenomenon. An investigation shows that C model seems to be the most prototypical. That is, if an ICM is constructed to analyze the ○ phenomenon, we may find that [○] is more prototypical than [我], [自己], etc. And the ICM can equally depict C model as more prototypical than both A model and B model, put against data of the same nature. This is so simply because in the process of grammatical fossilization of the phenomenon, CC (cognitive factors) holds sway (rather than physical contextual factors (PC) or linguistic contextual factors (LC)), and some ideological content (e.g. Im) may enter the semantic domain of ○ with the lapse of time and thus produce a ○/Im parasitic cognitive unit.

How the Chinese language encourages the paradigm shift toward discourse in linguistics

On Generalized-Topic-Based Chinese Discourse Structure.

Interface Conditions in Child Language: A View from Mandarin Chinese

Scope Processing in Chinese

The Interpretation of Disjunction in the Scope of Dou in Child Mandarin.

Scope Assignment in Child Language: Evidence from the Acquisition of Chinese

Children’s Interpretation of Ambiguous Wh-Adjuncts in Mandarin Chinese

Wh-Questions, Universal Statements and Free Choice Inferences in Child Mandarin.

Chinese Linguistics: An Introduction

EMPIRICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF MODERN CHINESE AS A MULTI-LEVEL SYSTEM FROM THE COMPLEX NETWORK APPROACH

An Empirical Study of the Effect of "saliency" and "competition" on Zero Anaphora in L2 Chinese Spoken Language

How Does Language Change As a Lexical Network? an Investigation Based on Written Chinese Word Co-Occurrence Networks

An ICM Approach to(Chinese)Zero Subject

Methodology and Trends of Linguistic Research in the Era of Big Data

Psychological Mechanism of Chinese Sentence Production:The State of the Art

Social changes through the lens of language: A big data study of Chinese modal verbs

A Cross-Linguistic Study of Stance Strategies in Abstracts of Linguistics Articles

Markedness reversal:The iconicity of prosody and syntax in Chinese

Geopolitics and the Changing Hierarchies of the Chinese Language: Implications for Policy and Practice of Chinese Language Teaching in Britain

Linguistic Theoretical Studies Since the Opening and Reform

The Study of “Interface” in Linguistics