Abstract:Open innovation (OI) is high on the commercial and political agenda. It revolves around R&D partnerships, set up to keep up with rapid technological developments. In negotiating such R&D partnerships, the allocation of intellectual property (IP) ownership, in particular patent ownership and trade secret control, is a difficult task. The lack of harmonization of IP law leads to challenges both for collaborating parties and third parties. Many legal patent systems, for instance, impose co-ownership as a default regime for jointly developed technologies. However, under such a regime the exploitation rights may significantly vary and may prescribe the consent of other owners in the case of use, licensing and sale of co-owned patents. These consent requirements may harm the interests of collaborating parties and complicate future exploitation of the technology concerned. To avoid this complexity, parties can establish their own applicable rules. The allocation of trade secret control, on the other hand, is only done on a contractual basis, as legislators do not foresee any default rules on the matter. Typically, the confidential nature of contracts will preclude third parties from obtaining information needed as a basis for initiating an OI process, such as licensing. Neither the default regime, nor the contract-based regime provides the necessary level of transparency and legal certainty to secure the smooth exploitation of jointly developed patents and trade secrets and future engagement in OI for both collaborating parties and third parties. The present paper examines the current IP framework for coupled OI processes in great depth. In addition, this paper reviews recent legislative initiatives to improve legal certainty and transparency, both at the national and EU level, and lists a number of potential legislative measures that could be imposed to further strengthen the legislative framework.

Research on an Appropriability Regime in Open Innovation: Based on Intellectual Property Right

On the Research of the Construction of the Intellectual Property Protection System for Collaborative Innovation---From the Perspective of Knowledge Spillover

A Conceptual Framework For Proprietary-Leveraged Innovation Capabilities

Third-party Relational Governance and Collaborative Innovation Performance: the Role of IPR Protection

Impact of Enterprise's De Facto Appropriability Mechanism on Open Innovation

Profiting from Innovation:A Review on the Empirical Literature on the Appropriablity Problem

The Game Theoretical Analysis on Knowledge Appropriation and Knowledge Protection in R＆D Cooperation

A Case Study on the Relationship between Enterprises' Informal Appropriability ,Openness and Innovation Performance

Institutional Regime Shift in Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation Strategies of Firms in China

WIPO initiative of transforming traditional resources and sharing rights: An evolutionary game analysis and a Chinese context

Intellectual Property Ownership in Coupled Open Innovation Processes

The Research on Enterprise's Innovation Resources Acquiring Mechanism under Open Innovation Paradigm Based on Teece's Theory Frame

A Theoretical Research on Intellectual Property Right Management System to Promote Indigenous Innovation

A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation

The impat of intellectual property right risk on the inter-firm knowledge transfer in collaborative innovation

Innovation and Appropriability: Revisiting the Role of Intellectual Property

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries

Open Innovation: A Research Framework And Case Study Of Huawei

Configuring intellectual property management strategies in co-creation: a contextual perspective

Profiting from Innovation:PFI Theoretical Framework and its Development

A Cooperative-Innovation-Based Analysis of the Factors That Influence Intellectual Property Risk