Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

Report on A Research Experiment on the Independent Sentencing Procedure: A Sample from the Wuhu Model

On Independent Sentencing Procedure:From the Perspective of Wuhu Pilot Model

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

The Retrospect and Prospect of Sentencing Procedure Reform in China

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

On the Investigation of Sentencing Information

Research on Sentencing Evidence Under the Background Of Sentencing Procedure Reform.

New Approach to Criminal Sentencing Procedures Reform

On the construction of sentencing procedure in the case of the defendants' pleading innocence——from the perspective of relatively independent sentencing program mode

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

The Road to Independent Sentencing Procedure by Reference to Foreign Experience

Win Some, Lose Some: Reforms of China’s Simplified Criminal Procedure

Sentencing Disparity and Sentencing Guidelines: the Case of China

Sentencing Recommendations, Anchoring Effect and Fairness in Criminal Justice—An Empirical Study Based on a Sample of 520 Sentences in K City

The Study of Standardized Sentencing of Juvenile Delinquency

Discussion on the System of Sentencing Proposal

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

The Improvement of Commutation and Parole Procedures in China

On the Theory and Practice of Criminal Sentence——Establishment of the Standard of Criminal Sentence