Relationship Between Sample Size and Variation of Means for Personal Noise Exposure in Weaving Workers

Yi-ming Zhao,Jing-qiao Lü,Lin Zeng,Shan-song Chen,Xiao-ru Cheng,Yu-qin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:0253-9624.2006.04.015
2006-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the relationship between sample size and variance of means for personal noise exposure in weaving workers as to contributing evidence for establishing personal noise exposure measurement guideline.METHODS:A personal noise exposure measurement database from a group of weaving workers was used in the randomized re-sampling data analysis. The sampling cases were one number selecting from one to fifteen at each randomized re-sampling procedure. The randomized re-sampling was one thousand times from original personal noise exposure measurement database to get one thousands of re-sampling database. One thousands of L(Aeq.8 h) mean were calculated by re-sampling databases. The variation of randomized re-sampling means was analyzed for different re-sampling numbers.RESULTS:The change for narrow trend of maximum, minimum, 95 percent number, 5 percent number of L(Aeq.8 h) mean was faster when randomized re-sampling number was smaller in variation vs randomized re-sampling number curve analysis. After that, the change for narrow trend of L(Aeq.8 h) mean was smooth for increasing the randomized re-sampling numbers. The 95% - 5% of L(Aeq.8 h) mean was about half for randomized re-sampling four cases (3.30 dB) vs one case (7.40 dB), and about one third for seven cases (2.44 dB), and about one fourth for eleven cases (1.85 dB).CONCLUSION:The sample size in personal noise exposure measurement guideline could be selected from four to eleven.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?