Implementation Analysis of Public Functions of 161 Centers of Disease Prevention and Control in 7 Provinces
Zhong-Xin Su,Hong-Bin Xie,Li Luo,Wei-Cheng Wang,Ying Wang,Mei Sun,Ning Ma,Jingjin Yu,Mingzhu Yu,Yong Duan,Xiangguang Gong,Zheng Chen,Hua Wang,Peiwu Shi,Zhankai Liang,Feng Yang,Dunzhi Wang,Jianning Yue,Shi Luo,Mo Hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8020.2005.04.001
2005-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the implementation of public function and items of the centers of disease prevention and control (CDC).METHODS:161 centers of disease prevention and control have been investigated by two-stage stratified sampling. The implementation analysis of public function and items of CDC is measured by multiplying average operational proportion and average operational degree.RESULTS:(1) For investigated centers, the average rate of function implementation is 42.9%, with 56.0% at provincial level and 43.7% at city level, 41.3% for the county level, while 49.3% in east areas, 45.4% in middle areas and 35.3% in west areas. (2) Among all 7 functional items, the implemented rate of disease prevention and control is 54.3%, 65.8% for emergency treatment, 35.0% for epidemic situation report and information management of health relative factors, 31.3% for inspection and control of health risk factors, 39.1% for the laboratory examination and evaluation, 36.4% for health education and health promotion, and 56.7% for technological guidance and application study.CONCLUSION:The implemented degree of public function of CDC was generally lower, varied with regions and levels. Among 7 public functional items, the emergency treatment function had the highest implementation, with the lowest for the inspection and control of health relative factors.