Abstract:Abstract Background The performance evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is crucial for enhancing the quality of public health services. With the ongoing reform of the CDC system in China, the existing performance evaluation system faces challenges. This study used the Delphi method to develop a new performance evaluation system for China’s provincial, city, and county-level CDC. Methods Following the “Structure-Process-Outcome” model, assessment indicators were systematically collected. Indicators were modified and screened through two Delphi rounds based on CDC responsibilities, health development, and national policies. Twenty-four experts provided ratings and recommendations, and the research team evaluated questionnaire reliability, expert positivity, expert authority, and opinion consistency. Results The preliminary index system identified through the literature review and pre-survey included 11 primary, 30 secondary, and 64 tertiary indicators. After the first round of consultation, two secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and 22 tertiary indicators were added. After the second round of consultation, three secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and three tertiary indicators were added, at which point the p -value of the test for Kendall’s coefficient of concordance W was < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation was within acceptable limits (< 0.25), so the consultation was concluded. The final index system included 11 primary, 25 secondary, and 67 tertiary indicators. Conclusions This study responded to the CDC system reform by developing a comprehensive performance evaluation index system for provincial, city, and county-level CDC in China. The index system is both scientifically grounded and practical, serving as an effective tool for promoting the high-quality work of CDC organizations.

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(12) : Laboratory Testing Ability is Improved

Performance assessment of provincial disease control and prevention system(2) :general information of performance of centers for disease control and prevention

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System (7) : Significant Improvement of Communicable Disease Control and Immunization Planning

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(6) : Laboratory Equipment Configuration Has Significantly Improved, but is Still Not Up to the Standard

Performance assessment for provincial disease control and prevention system(13):health education and health promotion have been widely carried out

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(14) : the Technical Guidance to the Primary Level Was Highly Emphasized, but the Application Research Needed to Be Inproved

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(11):Information Management Has Been Strengthened,but Information Network Needs Urgent Improvement

Performance Assessment of Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(1):General Information of Regions

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System( 10): the Disposal Ability of Public Health Emergencies Has Been Improved, While the Public Health Emergency Reserves Were Inadequate

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(5):Building Facilities Allocation Has Improved,but Still Can Not Meet the Needs

Analyzing the Performance Evaluation Results of the Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System

Performance Assessment of Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(3):The Quality of Staff is Developedbut Team Structure is Still Unreasonable

Analysis on Difference of Laboratory Test Ability in Municipal and County Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention System in China: Trends From 2002–2012

Performance of China Infectious Disease Automated-alert and Response System in 2014

Implementation Analysis of Public Functions of 161 Centers of Disease Prevention and Control in 7 Provinces

[Implementation analysis of public functions of centers of disease prevention and control of China].

Evaluation on the Efficiencies of County-Level Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in China: Results from a National Survey.

Operational Proportion of the Public Function and Items of 161 Centers of Disease Prevention and Control in 7 Provinces

Analysis of the Implementation of Public Functions in Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Shanghai from 2002 to 2005